Wednesday, November 16, 2011

BREAKING NEWS: Briarlake Elementary - A Community Led Astray?

Signs of the times.  Trees outside Briarlake Elementary School are tagged and ready for chopping.  The outside classroom  bleachers and stage sadly sit in the background.  It, too, will likely be a memory soon as it appers to be in the way of progress, according to the plans drawn up by T-mobile.  Briarlake Elementary and Lakeside High School were the only two schools that reportedly were in favor of cell towers at the time of the July 2011 school board vote.  But, after news spread about the plans, the community stepped up to tell a different story.  It may be too little, too late.  And, there may even be more towers on the way!

One of the most vocal opposition groups to the DeKalb County School Board's decision to place cell towers at 9 schools has come from the Briarlake community. GTCO-ATL was the first group to reach out to them and provide information in an effort to be good neighbors and good citizens helping to spread the word, as several school board members have admitted they did not do a very good job at themselves.

Shortly after our initial meeting, however, the PTA stepped in and decided to plot their own course. Stephanie Byrne is a parent who admits she knew about the proposal back in May, but didn't think it was anything serious enough to warrant telling her neighbors. She was even interviewed by CBS Atlanta way back then since her property backs up to one of the proposed cell tower sites and T-mobile will likely have to buy a portion of her property in order to comply with the county's setback requirements.  She said she followed the story until June when it was postponed and she didn't hear any more about it until after the July vote.

An ominous scene on Nov. 11, 2011.  Cell tower near Briarlake Elementary School and the address for the newly formed Briarlake Foundation which will be accepting money for iPads, despite RF radiation concerns growing worldwide.

While other neighbbors are in a panic to sell, from the looks of all the signs around the school, the Byrne household is only interested in setting out exensive signs opposing the towers and handing out buttons. Maybe that is because Stephanie and Mark Byrne have also been lucky to learn that their property values have somehow been swapped around just in 2011 where the property is valued far higher than the building. That should work in their favor when T-mobile comes knocking. Hopefully they will knock loud since they don't respond well to visual cues like the ones in orange and green all over the landscape that will soon be chopped and shreaded.


Byrne has led the movement to gain publicity and hound the school board even though it has been stated publically multiple times that the contrats are signed and it is a done deal. The school board began talks of cell towers back in the Fall of 2010, according to Paul Womack, school board representative and nearby neigbhor to Byrne. 


GTCO-ATL has recently learned that the timing of initial cell tower talks (Fall 2010 according to a statement by Womack) coincides with the application submitted by a big name construction law firm to file the paperwork for tax-exempt status and set up the Briarlake Elementary School Foundation, which can receive gift donations. Byrne and a fellow Briarlake parent, Michelle Decker, a parent council represenative, are the only ones with their names tied to any of the information that can be found online about this foundation, except the pricey paralegal who filed the paperwork.  With only 22 "likes" on their empty Facebook page, it is difficult to determine how a school of only 400 students has raised more than $4,000 with very little publicity for their efforts. Even more baffling is why they would state that their annual goal is $100K, which rivals that of Lakeside High School's similar foundation, The Valhalla Group, which is in a higher income bracket neighborhood and has more than 1,500 students.

Where Did They Go Wrong?
The questions are many and the answers are few. GTCO-ATL encourages anyone in the Briarlake community sincere about wanting to stop the cell tower to take their own actions rather than waiting for Superman, or anyone else, to do it for them. This is a long-term deal, spanning 30 years, that will be much more difficult to undo once the tower is up than it will be to stop it from going up in the first place.
Wonder if these folks know that the person who voted yes
at the School Board Meeting in July lives directly across
the street.  It would have been easier to walk over and talk
to Paul Womack about the decision than use an expensive
yard sign to send a message, don't you think?  Then again,
maybe they are already acquainted and that's the reason
for the metal fencing around the property, too.
We are not attorneys, but would like to recommend, as we have all along, that the time for speaking up in front of the school board and hoping to be heard has long past. The board has rendered its decision and stated that the contracts are signed. They have been asked to reconsider the vote and have stated many times that a reconsideration will not happen. The issue is now with the county's office of Planning & Sustainability and the Director of Planning's office under CEO Burrell Ellis.

DeKalb County commissioners have stated that T-mobile claims it is exempt from following our county's regulations for proper zoning procedures, but that issue is debatable and has not been decided in a court of law. They have also stated that their power is limited by the FCC ruling of 1996, but we suggest that there is language indicating that local govenment still has some control over the placement and location of towers, especially in residential areas.

Can a school board that is only elected for 4 years and is headed by an Interim Superintendent, sign a contract with little or no community input, for 30-years that will lease public school property that is actively being used for the primary purpose of educating children? And, if so, should they disclose the terms of the ageeement to the public?

Can they agree to allow some or all of the money to be directed toward individual PTAs or private foundations being led by PTA board members who also state they are against the cell tower and that they formed a resolution to official declare thier opposition?

And, most importantly, does the exemption to zoning regulations that is provided to the school system automatically apply to a commercial entity (and not even an American-based company at that), not at all related to education or providing any educational value, so that it may also enjoy the tax exempt status and the lax building approval process that the county gives its own school system?


Too Little, Too Late
At GTCO-ATL, we know what we would do. And, we are quite surprised to see how easily a community can be led astray without questioning the intentions of the people stepping in to help, the funding by which they are doing so, and the steps they are advocating in order to bring about a change.

Thowing out the Trash, alongside the SPLOST.  Briarlake's PTA also advocated
for SPLOST despite their "outrage" over the school board's recent decisions.
Henderson Middle and Lakeside High School are their feeder schools.  Henderson
is slated for SPLOST IV dollars while Lakeside is under construction with
SPLOST III.  What the SPLOST couldn't pay for, they hope cell towers will.
The Briarlake Elementary School Foundation has a new website www.briarlakefoundation.org/ that states "iPad technology" is one of the reasons it is rasing funds. Someone needs to tell Byrne and Decker to do a little more reseach about the real reasons true opposition groups have formed against the cell towers - RF Radiation has been upgraded by the World Health Organization to class 2b, possible human carcinigin. And, children are the most vulnerable population to this form of microwave radiation. If the iPads will be connecting wirelessly to the Internet, then they will add even more radiation to the classrooms that will already be seated under a massive 4G cell tower in a neighborhood that some can say is already drowning in a sea of radiation.

The community website Nobriarlaketower.org is now listed as an LLC. And, the organizers are not returning our calls. The site is updated on a regular basis, but has no mention of the activity at the cell tower site and only suggests the community do more of the same - which has so far resulted in nothing more than a lot of attention that could have been spent alerting the other 8 schools rather than just listening to the outcry from one.

And, we continue to wonder if the entire education system is so badly broken here in DeKalb that no one remembers to think about the most important thing at the bottom of all this mess - the children.  If anyone bothered to ask them, what do you think they would say?

19 comments:

  1. GTCO-ATL why don't you help Nobriarlaketower.org? You are bashing these people when they are trying to protect their community. GTCO-ATL appears to be contradicting to the removal of cell towers in the ATL communities. Nobriarlaketower.org is doing the best they can yet you bash them. Why? It seems to me that you could help them out. If you are a legit entity then help them out. GTCO-ATL is not looking good by this. Turn this around and do the right thing.
    No cell towers at Briar Lake!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anon 1:34, GTCO-ATL not only helped Briarlake, they are the whole reason the community found out when they did. Nobriarlaketower.org was started by the PTA when they realized the PR nightmare they were facing. The PTAs at most schools have now admitted they knew about the cell towers much in advance of the rest of the parents or community. They elected to remain neutral, which is really the same thing as silent approval in this case. If they were against it when they first heard it, we wouldn't be getting a tower.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "If you are a legit entity then help them out."

    Short of filing a lawsuit themselves, what else do you want GTCO-ATL to do? They are helping out by telling them to look around and see that they have trees about to be chopped down. If the other group has not noticed that, there is definitely something wrong!

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Briarlake Elementary and Lakeside High School were the only two schools that reportedly were in favor of cell towers at the time of the July 2011 school board vote." WHERE DID YOU GET THAT INFORMATION ???

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Briarlake Elementary and Lakeside High School were the only two schools that reportedly were in favor of cell towers at the time of the July 2011 school board vote." WHERE DID YOU GET THAT INFORMATION ???

    ReplyDelete
  6. We got that information because we were present at the time of the vote. In addition, we spoke with several different board members prior to the vote who indicated the same.

    It is recommended that you watch this video of the school board vote:
    1. Copy and paste this link into your browser: http://www.dekalb.k12.ga.us/pds24/vod/
    2. Scroll down until you locate the July 11, 2011, work session and business meeting link.
    3. Skip ahead to 2:41:30 in the video.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You will see that there is an ammendement offered to remove the schools that objected. It passed. That reduced the number from 12 to 9 schools. Then there was talk of removing all schools, but it was shot down due to statements about some schools wanting towers. Then there was an ammendement to remove all remaining schools EXCEPT the two that wanted the towers (Lakeside/Brairlake) - that ammendment failed. That would have removed 7 of the 9 schools, but it was voted on and not approved. So, all schools except the 3 removed for objecting were kept on the list. Even if the second ammendment would have passed, Briarlake and Lakeside would have remained as the only ones definitely in favor of the cell towers, presumably because Lakeside needs the money to finish its construction and Briarlake feeds into Lakeside. Their property values are strong based on strong schools so they are not as concerned about decline in value as other communities. They also have stated publically that the Valhalla Group will receive the money for Lakeside, not the PTA. Likely the new Briarlake Foundation will receive any money intended initially for their PTA. So we are handing over money to privately run foundations with no committment to public disclosure of funds or how funds will be used as the only stated benefit to a 30 year lease of public school property paid for by taxpayers in the entire county. And the person heading up one of those foundations is also heading up the protest. Sounds like a conflict of interest to us. What do you think? The principals are both named as board members for each of those foundations as well. Sounds like another conflict of interest if they were the ones charged with notifying the community.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Seriously....WHAT AUTHORITY at Briarlake and Lakeisde was given the ability to speak for their entire school community? Let's remove LHS from the equation -- as the majority of their *current* student-family population would likely be in favor. Do you know specifically of a formal group that gave the board members the impression (or even had the authority to do so) that Briarlake "wanted" this? As anyone should be able to see by now, Briarlake does NOT want this. So, regardless of the impression the board may have had before the July meeting (& again I am very curious to know who gave them this impression..the facts, not assumptions) -- the amount of labor intensive work that has gone into to stopping the towers should CLEARLY reflect the opposite to what your November 2011 "Breaking news:" blog post. It has me actually questioning the motive of that blog post ??? Please further explain. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Here is the explanation for the construction tape tied around trees at Briarlake, as given by Stephanie Byrne who's name appears as the person who created and updated the article titled, "Marked Trees on Campus," along with almost every other article on their website:

    One of our observant teachers noticed paint on the trees and in a stroke of brilliance, wrapped ribbons around them to increase visibility.


    If you believe that statement above, there is nothing anyone can do to help you.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I believe the previous post was inquiring about *factual information* you have (or not)..please stick to the facts - sarcasm and assumptions are not appreciated & do NOT earn respect.
    I watched the July 11th meeting video and see what you heard. Thank you for directing me to that site. However, I do not understand why you would not want the board to name WHO with authority to represent that school implied they wanted the tower. If there is something to uncover..find THAT out...we'd all be relieved....throwing names around of people who have given so much time of their lives to stop this nightmare really discounts your efforts, in my opinion, on this serious problem we are all facing. So, I ask you again....regarding Briarlake....do you know (& how do you know) specifically of a formal group which gave the board the impression they wanted the tower?
    No assumptions, just that facts please. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No one asked for an explanation on the ribbons ?????

    ReplyDelete
  12. Regarding your December 3rd post...
    your November post is not what I would consider "help." It's so damaging and simply not correct to twist the information or try to assume/question connections that do not exist. The Briarlake Foundation has absolutely NOTHING to do with this. "All the people you know" in the Briarlake community should easily be able to point out why your post was inappropriate. Please stop the dramatic sensationalism....the end result is a house divided which will not stand.....not good for anyone in the long run. Very happy for the Brockett community --but, IF a precedence is set with our schools....it could be a matter of time before the towers are everywhere...public parks, libraries, etc....so please
    re-think the slightly negative spin and misinformation that could be generated from your posts from here on out. Much appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  13. SLIGHTLY negative??? We are trying to WARN you as GOOD NEIGHBORS to wake up, look around and put your money toward HELPING. There is no SUPERMAN - this community will not be saved unless you get involved and help yourselves.

    One of the two people named as founders / leaders in the Briarlake Foundation is also one of the two "unknown" persons who attended the T-mobile meeting and did not inform the community. The other was likely her husband who stated to Paul Womack, "I put in cell towers all of this country." (See the Paul Womack meeting transcript.) and the construction is going on practically in these people's backyards, yet they mentioned nothing about it until WE drove by, saw the construction tape on the tree marked to be taken down, posted it here. And, even then, you were fed a ridiculous story about an "unknown teacher" who decided to wander around the nature trail, tying ribbons to trees (some that were marked with green spots, others were not) instead of teaching for a few hours. If you believe that - what else can we do?? We've been trying to warn this community since AUGUST, including the people we know personally and met during this journey. We are disappointed that anyone would focus their anger or frustration on us as we have tried our best to help you.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Read (past tense) the transcript. ABSOULTELY AMAZING that this site so easily believed Paul Womack's quote..the board member that has been preaching "the contracts are signed" from day 1 & yet will not produce a copy of any such contract. That was easy!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. (Anger and Frustration ?? HARDLY...disappointed with the "these-are-facts" writing style of this blog site --- absolutely. Assumptions and quotes from the board do not = facts..come on? really ??

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. (previous comment deleted due to typo... repost is below.)

    In the July 11, 2011, meeting (watch the video), Interim Superintendent Ramona Tyson was responding to inquiries about methods the communities might have to speak up if they were against the towers and simply had not learned about them, yet. She said, very clearly, that as soon as the vote was over, "the signature" of the district would be affixed to the contract and the board would not have any way to take it back. The only method to give the communities more time, according to Ms. Tyson, would be to pull the item from the agenda. This sentiment was followed up by statements made by Paul Womack, Pam Speaks, Donna Edler, Jesse Cunningham and others as well as reported on the newscasts and in the newspaper. This same sentiment was recently reported by the new Superintendent Atkinson as well as by the school system's spokesperson Walter Woods.

    GTCO-ATL has been the one to repeatedly point out that the final, signed contract has not been released for the public to view. And, in fact, we produced an Open Records Request that was sent to the school board several months ago where we asked them to make the contract(s) available to the public. Our request was met with a reply letter from the district's attorney (or one of them), which we also made public. They wanted hundreds of dollars to comply with this Open Records Request.

    We do know that the permit process cannot begin with the county unless the cell company, T-mobile, could claim that they have legal rights to the property on which they want to build their structure.

    Since signs of beginning the permit application process have been reported at Brairlake and Margaret Harris (and witnessed firsthand by GTCO-ATL volunteers), then we believe that it is fair to assume that the documents exist giving rights to T-mobile to move ahead.

    If you are concerned about the details of the contract, then please submit a request under the Open Records Act and please post the results of your request in a public manner so that all the schools may benefit from learning the details.

    If it is your assertation that since no one has seen the contract that it does not exist, then you have not paid attention to how our board conducts business. There are lots of documents we have not seen in this case, such as the attendance records of who was at those T-mobile meetings or the mintues from the meetings held in late 2010 where the cell tower discussions began and T-mobile made its convincing pitch to our board that cell towers were fine and did not pose a health risk.

    If there are statements out there that might convince us all that these towers are not harmful, then by all means, let us read those documents. Let us see what the board saw so that we might be convinced as well. Make all the information public, but at the very least - let us see the contract so our schools know what to expect.

    Your skepticism is valid, although we suggest that your target (us) is a bit misplaced. Please direct your frustration toward the people who have forced this issue upon all of us. We don't like it any more than you do. And we have no reason to report anything other than the facts.

    ReplyDelete
  18. For the record, GTCO-ATL has also been the driving force early on about getting financial data in front of the public. Anyone who states that they attended a May T-mobile meeting and walked away in favor of cell towers due to the financial impact it would have for the school is either lying to you or very trusting that there would be some sort of financial reward in exchange for the risks because no such data was made available at those meetings. After many requests and calling attention to the fact that we could not ask a community to weigh pros and cons without at least telling them what the pros might be (ie. dollars) - we finally got financial data posted on the school system's website less than 48 hours before the July vote. And those documents are available in our downloads section. They mention nothing of giving money specifically to the PTAs or to the schools. They do mention an initial $2K to be paid upon signing of the leases. It is our belief that this money is now sitting in some PTA accounts or perhaps some foundation accounts somewhere, but that is speculation since we obvioulsy do not have access to those account records.

    ReplyDelete
  19. To Anonymous Dec 5, 2011 09:19 PM
    GTCO is a blog, not the actual 6:00 news. Although FOX may be considered a blog since they seem to favor the telecom industry. Don't bite the hand that feeds you right. Was that statement too opinionated for you to? The real facts will be revieled when the Grand Jury comes a knockin'. The comments made on GTCO have been fluff compared to the actual truth. You know what I am referring to. Good luck. Like most of the school roofs, your community has a lot of leaks. Too late to fix them now.

    ReplyDelete

We want to know what you think. Leave your respectful comments here!