Monday, December 17, 2012

SACS' Verdict is in: PROBATION for DCSD


DeKalb school district in “conflict and crisis,” put on probation by accreditation agency

By Ty Tagami

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
An accrediting agency is accusing the DeKalb County School District of a decade of “poor, ineffective governance,” announcing Monday that it’s placing the district on probation, leading to possible removal of the school board.
After a six-month investigation, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools found evidence of missing money, school board nepotism and board member influence on which schools students, particularly athletes, attend.
Despite exerting influence in areas where they had no formal role, members of the school board failed to oversee their primary responsibility: the money. DeKalb is “perilously close” to running out of cash, said Mark Elgart, the president and chief executive officer of SACS parent company AdvancED. Despite annual revenues approaching $1 billion, some students don’t have textbooks and most have no access to computers or the Internet. This is because the school board, administrators and others in decision-making positions put the interests of adults before those of children, he said.
The findings prompted SACS to bring the ultimate threat: loss of accreditation. It could happen a year from now. Meanwhile, DeKalb is now on probation, Elgart said. School officials have the interim to address the concerns. SACS will be sending teams to monitor the response in the spring and fall.
School board chairman Eugene Walker said he was disappointed by the decision. “Nobody wants to be on probation,” he said. He also said he understands why SACS reached its judgment. The school board will take the message seriously and respond to restore its accreditation, he said. “I’m also optimistic that we’re going to rise to the occasion.”
Walker said he’s not concerned that Gov. Nathan Deal will remove the school board, which is possible under a new state law that covers districts on probation. “We’ve not done anything egregious,” Walker said.
The new law requires the state school board to convene a hearing on the SACS findings within 30 days. After that, the state board can either make an immediate recommendation to the governor or monitor the situation and give the local board time to address the concerns.

SACS will release results of DeKalb Schools investigation


Posted by  on December 16, 2012. in Reporters Newspapers


Parents in DeKalb County anxious about the accreditation status of their children’s schools will learn on Monday whether they are at risk of losing accreditation.

AdvancED, the umbrella group that includes the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, announced on Sunday, Dec. 16, that there will be a press conference at its Alpharetta headquarters Monday to discuss the results of their investigation into DeKalb County Schools.
“(President and CEO) Mark Elgart will share the findings of the review team and the implications and next steps for the school system,” the announcement says.
In August SACS notified school officials it had received numerous allegations that the school system is in violation of accreditation standards. It says the complaints allege the school board has mismanaged school funds, spent too much on services such as legal fees and that board members have undermined the school administration.
Allegations include board members using their influence in hiring decisions and meddling in budgeting procedures. The complaints also allege board members routinely violated board policy, disclosing confidential information from closed meetings and making direct requests of individual staff members.

Tucker Parent Council Meets Tonight, Public Invited


GTCO-ATL Representatives Plan to Attend These Meetings and Will Provide Summaries for our followers here on our website.  Don't forget, you can also "friend" us on Facebook to have further conversations about the issues facing all our schools:  Just go to:  www.facebook.com/Get.the.Cell.Out.ATL and click the "Like" button.
Public Meeting Tonight Re: School Issues Affecting Tucker!
The Tucker Parent Council (TPC) hosts its last meeting of the year tonight.
WHEN:   Monday, Dec. 17, 6:30 p.m. 
WHERE:  Midvale Elementary School
WHY:  a candid discussion about the issues facing our Tucker Schools
The TPC email address is tuckerparentcouncil@gmail.com 
Midvale's phone number is  678-874-3402.
We will be revisiting items left unresolved at the last TPC meeting and will be addressing additional concerns. 
GUEST:  Regional superintendent Cynthia Brictson will be our guest," the council member added. 

--  AND --

Public Feedback Meeting Re: Facilities Plan
(includes the closing of Livsey and merging children into Smoke Rise Charter School)
WHEN:  Tuesday, Jan. 15, 2013 - Time not yet announced
WHERE:  Tucker High School
WHY:  the school district will listen to public comments regarding the new Five-Year Facilities Plan.


About the Tucker Parent Council
Chartered in 2002, Tucker Parent Council (TPC) was formed to serve as an advocate for Tucker-area schools, encouraging citizens to be individual change agents on behalf of public education, and to serve as a conduit for productive dialog between the DeKalb County School District and Tucker area stakeholders.  All parents and community members are encouraged and welcome to attend.

Schools represented in TPC are: 
Brockett Elementary; 
Idlewood Elementary; 
Livsey Elementary; 
Midvale Elementary; 
Smoke Rise Charter School; 
Tucker Middle School; 
and Tucker High School.

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Who Cares About the Children?


At Get the Cell Out - ATL we are saddened at the news of the senseless violence that took place in a kindergarten classroom on Friday, Dec. 14.  We grieve for the loss of children so young with their whole lives ahead of them and for the families of the victims who will have so much heartache ahead of them as we enter the holidays this year and undoubtedly for the rest of their lives.
And, we are so thankful for the teachers, police and other adults at the school that day who did what they could to be there for all the children, to keep them safe and to protect them from the horror by leading them out safely and telling them to close their eyes.  The adults were there to protect those children that day.  But, what are we doing, today?  (click headline for full story)
Do the adults making decisions that affect children and our educational institutions really understand the effects and outcomes of their actions and policies?  Are these people who truly love and care about children so that they are making choices based on what is best for them?  Or has our education system become so involved in a political showdown between different views and perspectives that it is now run by people who see children in terms of "headcount" or dollars?  Have we made the schoolyard into a battlefield and turned children into pawns?  
Do those we are electing to our government offices, the ones who make and enforce the laws in our country, see children the same way we do?  Do they understand that to a parent a child is everything, worth more than anything money can buy? Are they capable of seeing our children as individuals with rights and with lives that are worthy of protecting, nurturing and saving?
20 families will be planning funeral services in Newtown, CT, instead of
celebrating the holidays with their young children who were killed by
a man with reports of mental illness and easy access to several deadly
assault weapons.  He also took the lives of 8 adults, including his own
mother and himself before law enforcement even knew what was
going on inside an elementary school classroom Friday.
So many of us are likely thinking today about what we would have done if this tragedy happened at our school, in our own child's classroom.  There are no easy answers.  At Sandy Hook Elementary on Friday, there was so little time for anyone to do anything ... at least on that day.  But, we do have time to do something now, don't we?  

We can start looking for ways to prevent the next school shooting, to take action now.  But, will our leaders rise to this challenge?  Or will it be another tragedy come and gone as the media moves on to the next story and our collective conscientiousness again fades and our call to action is met with rhetoric and debate?
While we believe a review of the safety at our schools is warranted, it is also important to note that the shooter literally shot an entrance into the building. He was not buzzed in. That's what an assault weapon can do.  
Will the nation, regardless of political parties, finally come together to put limits on assault-style weapons?  Do rural hunters believe their rights will be infringed if children in urban areas are considered worthy of protecting against attacks like this one?  As events like this becoming shockingly more and more common, what responsibility do we all have to put politics aside and do the right thing?
Do violent video games play a role?  These games are addictive among many of those who fit the profile of these mass murderers - white, intelligent young men or teen boys.  These games are so realistic and they glorify the killer as a hero and allow a fantasy of carnage as just a consequence of achieving a victory or promotion to the next level.  
Anything done in excess can be argued as unhealthy, but these games are a particular concern because of the desensitization they can cause to the murder of other human beings in a military style assault.  In many cases, these young gamers' brains are still developing and what they spend hours doing every day, playing a game, may have dire consequences to the way their mind in shaped and how they relate to others in the real world.
Where do the constitutional rights of the few overrule the safety of everyone else, and most especially - our children?  We will be considering these and other related issues in the days, weeks and months ahead.  

Here is a look at some other comments and news on the web today surrounding this tragedy, 

and a link to President Obama's address to the U.S. 


From CNN's Report on the Victims:  Robbie Parker is a father who lost his 6-year old daughter in the school shooting Friday.  Fighting back tears with his voice cracking, Parker asked Saturday night that the tragedy "not turn into something that defines us, but something that inspires us to be better, to be more compassionate and more humble people."  

Excerpts from 

Bloomberg: Gun control should be Obama’s ‘number one agenda’

Posted by Sean Sullivan on December 16, 2012 at 10:11 am
NEWTOWN, Conn. (AP) — A man opened fire Friday inside the Connecticut elementary school where his mother worked as a teacher, killing 26 people, including 20 children, as youngsters cowered in their classrooms and trembled helplessly to the sound of gunfire reverberating through the building.
The killer, armed with two handguns, committed suicide and another person was found dead at a second scene, bringing the toll to 28, authorities said.

Originally published: December 15, 2012 5:45 PM
Updated: December 16, 2012 12:21 AM
By VÍCTOR MANUEL RAMOS AND MACKENZIE ISSLER victor.ramos@newsday.com,mackenzie.issler@newsday.com
“Our hearts are broken today,” a tearful President Barack Obama, struggling to maintain composure, said at the White House. He called for “meaningful action” to prevent such shootings.
“The majority of those who died were children – beautiful, little kids between the ages of 5 and 10 years old,” Obama said.
He paused for several seconds to keep his composure as he teared up and wiped an eye. Nearby, two aides cried and held hands as they listened to Obama.
“They had their entire lives ahead of them – birthdays, graduations, wedding, kids of their own,” Obama continued about the victims. “Among the fallen were also teachers, men and women who devoted their lives to helping our children.”

Full Text of the President's Address to the Nation Following the Tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, CT found here.

From NBC News:  Mark Kelly, husband of former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, who was gravely injured in a shooting on Jan. 8, 2011, said he and his wife were sending their prayers to the victims.
"As we mourn, we must sound a call for our leaders to stand up and do what is right. This time our response must consist of more than regret, sorrow, and condolence. The children of Sandy Hook Elementary School and all victims of gun violence deserve leaders who have the courage to participate in a meaningful discussion about our gun laws - and how they can be reformed and better enforced to prevent gun violence and death in America. This can no longer wait,” Kelly’s statement on Facebook read in part.

Saturday, December 15, 2012

DeKalb Delegation Holds Town Hall Meeting


DeKalb Delegation Holds Town Hall Meeting

A summary of Thursday's event at Cross Keys High School.
Members of the DeKalb Delegation addressed a crowd of about 50
or more residents in north / central Dekalb County on Thursday,
Dec. 14.  Two more meetings are scheduled before the
legislative session begins Jan. 14.
The panel of five state representatives were: Rep. Mary Margaret Oliver, Rep. Mike Jacobs,Rep. Scott Holcomb, Rep. Tom Taylor and Rep.Michele Henson. Apologies were given by Hensen on behalf of Rep. Karla Drenner who had planned to attend but was unable to be there.

The 2013 legislative session begins January 14 and runs through an estimated date of April 18. As the head of MARTOC, Rep. Mike Jacobs spent the majority of the first portion of the meeting discussing the failed T-SPLOST vote and the future of public transportation in Atlanta. He said that it was clear to him that there will not be public support for transit until "MARTA gets its house in order. So, that's what we are going to do."

Jacobs noted that there were also concerns about the penny sales tax already being levied for MARTA on sales in Fulton and DeKalb counties alone. The T-SPLOST sales tax would have added another penny to every dollar spent in these two counties, making the burden of their costs higher than any of the other counties who would also be benefiting from the programs that would be funded.

Rep. Oliver added that Georgia is the only state out of 50 that does not have any state funding directly allocated for public transportation. The state has contributed to it in various ways, but the only way you will see direct funds specifically for the purpose of transit is with the voter approved SPLOST dollars unless something changes.

Rep. Henson stepped in to add that she did not believe that MARTA was the only contributing factor to the failure of T-SPLOST. "If you ask me, I'd say it was pretty clear that the voters don't trust their government officials to do the right thing with their money," she said. "That's the real problem we ought to be addressing. I mean, that's what I've been hearing."

There was also discussion about the district maps that were redrawn, leaving many communities like Tucker very upset with the configurations that, for many, place them into long and narrow districts that have enormous diversity in thought on various issues. Rep. Taylor assured the audience that the districts were drawn according to the law and every rule for fair distribution was followed.

During the second half of the meeting the attendees were encouraged to ask questions or offer up topics for discussion that concern them. The questions ranged from that of privatization of government, pedestrian safety, cell phone towers and the possible annexation of neighborhoods into the city of Decatur.

Rep. Jacobs stated that an audit completed by KPMG of MARTA showed specifically where privatization of certain areas would result in significant cost savings. The audience member asking the question added that public safety should remain a priority.

After hearing from my citizens' group Get the Cell Out - Atlanta, he offered to check on the status of the bill from the last legislative session that would ban cell towers from public school grounds. Jacobs was a co-sponsor of the bill and stated that it did have bi-partisan support. Instead of a ban, protesters were left with a non-binding, advisory referendum on the July ballot. The change in the bill happened after what the representatives described as a "decent upon the capitol" by numerous telecommunications lobbyists who did not want the bill to pass.

"That advisory referendum was intended to send a message to your local school board about exactly what the people in these communities want or do not want," said Jacobs. "You should always check with your local school board member on any issue you have regarding the schools and how your child might be affected."

Rep. Holcomb added that the ban on towers would not have helped the schools under contract, but it would have clarified what the tower companies could do in the future.

The referendum was included on the July 2012 ballot. Voters across the county responded by a vote of 62% that they did not approve of the practice of placing cell towers on school grounds.

Audience member Viola Davis of Unhappy Taxpayer and Voter said that the results of the referendum are exactly why you don't see cell towers at any of our schools to this day. So, in her opinion, even though the original bill to ban the towers was killed, the referendum did the job that many hoped it would do. The towers were not built and the contracts between the school system and T-mobile have all expired.

Many attendees spoke about the process of creating cities which has been in the news at lot lately and under consideration. A representative from the neighborhood of Medlock Park and nearby Medlock Place stated that their areas wanted to be able to vote on whether or not they wanted to be annexed. It was clear that the subject matter had divided many neighborhoods and pitted them against one another. 
Rep. Henson clarified that the issue was sitting with the city of Decatur at the moment and no movement would be seen on the issue until they decide if they want to annex any areas into their city limits.

Candice Jordan from a group called "Juvenile Justice Reform," stated her frustration with trying to gain reform in the areas of juvenile detentions and homicide victims rights. Rep. Oliver told her that any non-profit or special interest group wanting to contribute to these areas need to be prepared to use evidence-based practices or, in other words, proof that your suggestions for reform are legitimate and warrant spending of tax dollars.

"Different people believe different things," said Oliver. "Some say mentoring works, some think that locking them up will do the trick. What I'm saying is that you had better come prepared if you want to state that you have an answer because there is a lot of debate out there about exactly what the right thing to do might be."

Rep. Taylor added that this was an area the public can really expect to see some changes in the next couple years as it is something they plan to focus on. There was information provided about how the public can become more involved when they have issues they want to discuss. Contact your state representative and find out who his/her secretary is. Then you can ask to be placed on the email list for alerts about upcoming meetings on that topic. There are also a few Mondays at noon that are set aside for the delegation to speak with the public and the county commissioners also attend.

Stephanie Miller, a resident in Dunwoody wanted to know if there were results from a study about the necessity of a county CEO and whether there would be any changes. She said that the commissioners are essentially powerless and ineffective on anything other that setting the budget.

Estelle Williamson, a concerned resident in Avondale who wants better safety in her area where crime is on the rise, asked the question that was on many people's minds. She asked, "will we see you pass legislation to ban the gifts from lobbyists? Or will we see a total ban of contributions and gifts?"

The delegates were quick to remind the audience that they have not been in session so any delays are simply time matters and the subject will likely come back up again in the new session.

Henson and Taylor both gave examples of when a lobbyist might make a gift of something minimal that might not even register in their minds as even being a gift. Hensen mentioned having friends who are also lobbyists and Taylor mentioned attending a lobbyist-sponsored meeting to learn about the particular industry.

Rep. Holcomb ended the meeting by stating, "I actually don't think it's all that complicated. You know who your friends and family are and you should be able to tell when someone is giving you something because they want to influence your opinion on a particular subject. It's especially easy if you haven't seen them all year and they suddenly pop up around the Jan. - March timeframe with invitations to dinner every night of the week."

"I'd like to see a limit on gifts to no more than $100," said Holcomb, "but I really don't think you'll see anything that limits campaign contributions. That's something that is a big part of the culture here and would be very hard for many people to give up."

Would you like to hear more? Don’t miss your chance to speak directly to your state delegation members about what's in store for 2013. And, don’t miss your chance to ask about legislation you were following from 2012. Plan to attend one of these upcoming Town Hall meetings in January:
Jan. 3, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. - approximately 8 p.m. at the Maloof Auditorium, 1300 Commerce Drive, Decatur
Jan. 8, 2013, at 6:30 p.m. - approximately 8 p.m. at the Porter Sanform Center, 3181 Rainbow Drive, Decatur.

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Tips for Attending the DeKalb Delegation Meeting



This blog post was published on December 12, 2012 at 5:30 pm. on The Tucker Patch

Local Voices
Cheryl Miller
Get the Cell Out - ATL


On Thursday evening, your locally-elected state Representatives and Senators will hold a Town Hall Meeting at the Cross Keys High School at 6:30 p.m. Should you attend? Absolutely! Here is why:
Like it or not, we live in the state which was recently named the MOST corruptible in the U.S. today for our lack of accountability measures, open-ended allowances on gifts and donations from lobbyists and other special interest groups and our low voter turnout. DeKalb is in a lot of turmoil right now and if there will be any help at a state level, it will have to start with these men and women who are sworn to represent us.  
But, a problem with our culture right now is that we often complain about "the way things are," but we do not actually participate in the process to make things better. We do not vote or read about the issues on the ballot, so we end up with irresponsible incumbents who get re-elected term after term only because they are the name on the ballot that is more recognizable. We end up with issues like the charter school amendment and SPLOST votes that passed mainly because the voters did not understand what they were being asked.  
Tricky wording on ballots has been a trend during the last legislative session and one I personally hope the delegation will explain. But, if we do not show up to ask the questions or even listen to what is on the agenda for 2013, we will find ourselves, the taxpayers, as the "odd man out" once again. The stakes in this little game of keep-away, unfortunately, are very high. Our money, property values, schools, health and even rights to free speech have all been up for grabs and many of us "regular folks" have found out too little too late.  
DeKalb County is the most diverse county in the entire state of Georgia, and also one of the wealthiest. Are you aware that more than 60% of your annual property tax dollars are collected by the state and then a formula is applied before they decide how much of that to give back to us for educating our own children? Even worse, the last few years the formula, which many say is outdated and unfair to larger counties like ours, has dictated that $100 million of our own money be redistributed to other counties throughout the state, most notably including Gwinnett County.  
Our state delegation is made up primarily of Democrats, which reflects the views of our urban residency, yet they must operate in one of the strongest Republican states in the nation. Our school system may carry the name of our county, but did you know that they are actually a part of the state education structure?  
Many of the initiatives we have witnessed in our schools appear to be the work of ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative club of Republicans who have been passing legislation in favor of corporations over the individual rights of our citizens for many years now. However, in Georgia they have been particularly successful because of the general acceptance of voters of whatever their party puts before them.  
Republican goals for education vary greatly from that of their fellow Democrats. While neither side appears to have an absolute answer, the Republicans appear to be pushing the proliferation of privately funded schools through charters or by incentives for parents to take their children out of public school and put them into a private one. They want to privatize our schools, taking loyalty and accountability out of the picture completely as far as parents are concerned and placing it in the hands of big businesses, and not necessarily ones that are even based in Georgia. 
Knowing this little bit of information could be very helpful to voters as they consider the candidates for the board elections that will take place Nov. 2014 last time I checked. But, our school board elections are "non-partisan" even though their policies appear to be following a very partisan rule book.
In addition, we each can cast just one vote for the representative in our own, narrowly defined area. Yet, the members of the school board do not impact a single area by themselves. They are expected to work together, as a team, but we elect them in a manner that suggests a competition. If we all had equal opportunity to vote for the full board, then every vote would truly count and every school board member would be accountable to all of us and all our children. We could stop the in-fighting and start putting together a real team.  
These ideas are not novel, but they warrant consideration. If our delegation has not come up with some kind of a plan to help our children, then they are clearly not focused on the change that we so desperately need. 
I, for one, plan to ask our delegation what they plan to do this coming year about the problems in our schools. Their failure to help is just as large of a contributing factor to the downslide in education as their failure to allocate proper funds. They have the power. But, we have the voice.  
Whether you choose to speak or just come to listen, please try to attend. Just knowing that you are there and you are paying attention will let them know that we do not expect for 2013 to be "business as usual."

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

DeKalb County Schools superintendent lays out plans to go digital



by Nicole Dow
December 12, 2012 09:00 AM | 1276 views | 2 2 comments | 16 16 recommendations | email to a friend | print
DeKalb County Superintendent Dr. Cheryl Atkinson holds up a netbook during the State of the System Address in which she talked about how students learn digitally as opposed to using textbooks.
DeKalb County Superintendent Dr. Cheryl Atkinson holds up a netbook during the State of the System Address in which she talked about how students learn digitally as opposed to using textbooks.
As part of a mission to advance the DeKalb County School District’s use of technology, Superintendent Cheryl Atkinson said more than 8,200 middle school students will transition from using textbooks to using Lenovo netbooks next school year.

“No longer will our students be saddled by heavy backpacks,” she said as she made the announcement during her State of the System address last week.

Students from Cedar Grove, Chamblee, Lithonia, Peachtree, Redan, Stone Mountain and Tucker middle schools will receive the digital devices loaded with information from all their textbooks in the fall. By the fall of 2014, the superintendent plans to have all middle and high school students transitioned to using netbooks.

Teachers and administrators must keep up with students’ growing use of technology, Atkinson said.

“The fact is that our children have an intellectual complexity that demands that we change our educational approach,” she added.

Atkinson said teachers will also get laptops to use as a tool to digitally access information to share with their students. She added the district plans to have 100 percent of its facilities wireless by next fall.

“Currently, only 38 percent of our district is wireless,” she said. “Thanks to funds allocated for technology by the Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax — better known as SPLOST — we have scheduled an incredibly aggressive plan to get every single one of our facilities wireless by August of 2013.”

Another district initiative is to have all classrooms equipped with interactive whiteboards by the end of the next calendar year.

The technological advances are not the only initiatives the superintendent outlined in her address. This academic year, every 11th grader will take the SAT during the school day in April. Students’ SAT and ACT scores from the 2011-12 school year improved at a rate greater than that of the state and nation and the percentage of students scoring a three or higher on Advanced Placement exams increased at a rate higher than the state, she said.

Since being appointed to the district in September 2011, Atkinson’s job has not been without its share of hardships. She briefly alluded to the accreditation concerns posed by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools and mentioned the district’s budget woes, which resulted in personnel layoffs. Despite the challenges, Atkinson said the district plans to stay fully accredited and is currently running within budget.


Read more: NeighborNewspapers.com - DeKalb County Schools superintendent lays out plans to go digital 

DeKalb Delegation Hosts Town Hall Meeting Tomorrow. You Should Attend.

This event and others are also posted on our Events page, accessible from the Home Page by the drop-down at the top.

Hope to see you there!  We will be asking about:

  • the cell tower ban on school grounds bill and whether it will be re-introduced this year.  
  • the school system maps which are still unclear.  
  • AND, we will be floating an idea for changes to the way school board members are elected if time allows.  GTCO-ATL would like to push legislation to change our school board elections so that the candidate's political party must be disclosed on the ballot as we believe it has been a deceptive practice by members of ALEC to push forth a political agenda on our schools without giving the voters the opportunity to review their qualifications for the job with the knowledge that politics could come into play in the decision-making process. 


Look for a summary here afterwards, but do not let that be a reason you stay home.  The more people who show up for something like this, the more our representatives know we plan to hold them accountable for their actions in the year ahead.


WHAT: Town Hall Meetings to inform residents of DeKalb County about the upcoming 2013 legislative session of the Georgia General Assembly.
                          WHEN:Thursday, December 13, 2012
                                      6:30 PM

            WHERE: Cross Keys High School, 1626 N Druid Hills Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30319




Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Bittersweet Goodbyes from Board Members; Walker, Cunningham Lose Support; MLK Students Plan Protest

Walker and Atkinson, above, at a prior board meeting where 
they acknowledged the SACS inquiry, were both a bit
stunned by the large crowd at the meeting on Dec. 10.  They
agreed to hold off on a vote on redistricting until after the
first of the year.
The DeKalb County School Board met last night, Dec. 10, in front of a packed house.  We were very pleased to hear some intelligent, well-thought out, factual presentations during the public comments portion of the meeting, which lasted nearly and hour and a half.

Many times, the audience broke out into spontaneous applause, an act the board chairs have frequently admonished on many occasions, but with little success.  One woman who said she had two children at Henderson Middle, called the board to task on the incorrect or vague numbers given in the sloppy proposal put before the board by Superintendent Atkinson.  The speaker demanded more detailed, education-based proof that what was being proposed for the redistricting made sense and warranted an abandonment of the prior redistricting plan that was developed only two years ago.  She received cheers and applause.

Another speaker, a PTA President, who also happens to be Jay Cunningham's wife, from Martin Luther King, Jr. High School, read a letter from a current MLK student and when she was not able to finish it, another speaker offered to read it during her time.  It stated that the students were losing faith in the adults and were planning to protest.

Willie Pringle, one of our favorite speakers who often says he tries to be "a voice for the voiceless" was there to place blame on the board members and issued a warning that they are not above a recall vote by the people.  He said he wanted to know where the money is.  He also demanded justification for the board's  plans to work with the same architectural firm that we are still in court doing battle with over the problems stemming from the last SPLOST.  He accused them of illegal activity and told them that God is not pleased.  You go, Willie Pringle!

Mr. Willie (a.k.a. Mr. Bill) Pringle sounded off at the Dec. 10
school board meeting in DeKalb.  Has he and others finally
had enough of the deceit?  By the sound of the public comments,
he is not alone and may want to recall some of the
board members if they do not vote properly on the
current plan to redistrict and close more schools.   
Chairman, Dr. Eugene Walker stated that the board normally does not respond to public comments, but he felt he needed to set the record straight.  He insisted that there is no mismanagement of funds and "you have honorable people sitting up here representing you."  The crowd of parents, teachers, taxpayers and others chuckled simultaneously out loud at that thought, which only made Dr. Walker continue to defend the school board and administration.

He talked about the various audits that have taken place and said that nothing substantial has come from them.  But, we have to wonder... how would an audit of books that do not accurately reflect the money coming into the school system ever be able to show that the money is being used inappropriately?  If it never hits the books to begin with, there simply is nothing to show for it.  Dr. Walker clearly does not understand that an audit only reviews the facts and figures presented in the accounting ledger being reviewed to determine if there are any questionable items.

As one simple example of how this logic is faulty, just take a look at the cell tower deals that were signed on July 12, 2011 by the board of education.  There was money indicated in the contracts that should have hit the books immediately upon signing.  There was an initial $2,000 per school for simply the opportunity to access the property and begin conducting necessary tests to secure permits.  That time frame ran out and, according to the contracts, another $2,000 was to be paid to extend that "due diligence" period another six months.

Of 12 schools, 9 remained on the final, approved list.  Nine times $2,000 is $18,000 plus another $18,000 is $36,000.  There was also supposed to be $25,000 per school paid into the general fund and then used by the individual schools receiving the towers.  That's another $225,000.  And, for every co-locator, the same deal. With three co-locators expected, that's another $675,000 for a grand total of $936,000 - nearly one million dollars right up front.

That money is.... where?  Did the schools get it?  Did the PTAs get what they were promised?  As Mr. Pringle said, "WHERE IS THE MONEY?"  Did the PTAs throw a big party as Mr. Paul Womack had suggested to the parents at Briarlake Elementary?  Did any of the booster clubs received some large deposits that are anonymous in nature around this same time?  Are we the only ones who remember the facts surrounding these cell towers and the financial windfall that the board members led us to believe would soon follow?

This is the kind of thing Willie Pringle and others are talking about.  An audit would never show money that never makes it to the books in the first place.

Here's a quote directly from the cell tower contracts:
   "Neither party shall record this Lease in the official records of DeKalb County."

Right there is the proof, Dr. Walker, of the mismanagement of our funds.  Money is missing and we are dealing with criminals.

When we stop giving them the benefit of the doubt and start realizing what we are dealing with, we might finally begin to see progress toward restoring our schools.  Until then, all the talk in the world will not change things.  People are getting rich off our tax dollars while children continue to be deprived of their rights to a quality education.

If you are paying attention now, thank you.  But, please do not stop when your "issue" is resolved.  Nothing will ever be better here unless we all work together until ALL the issues are right and those who are doing an injustice to our children are kicked out of their positions of power.

Please, do not THANK them for something like delaying a decision.  They are not doing you any favors.  They are buying themselves more time in order to better deceive you or otherwise shut you  up so that they can continue taking our money.

And, to end the evening's agenda, board members Don McChesney, Tom Bowen and Paul Womack summed up their experiences on the board as this would be their last official public meeting.  To summarize:


  1. McChesney was sincere and warned the public to beware of those who seek to help their own agendas without concern for all the children.  He also assured the public that he is not sexist, despite rumors surrounding a published email where he suggested that women should not be invited to attend a particular meeting.  He thanked his wife and those who voted for him.  He named Nancy Jester and Pam Speaks as being his friends, confidants and said they are truly in it for the children.  We think that was his way of saying that everyone else on the board is as corrupt as we think they are.
  2. Bowen said a lot of lawyer-type gibber-gabber but did not appear to be concerned about anything other than how he looked on the TV monitors.  He was likely distracted by the thought of being called as a witness in the Crawford Lewis trial, now put off until April.
  3. And, finally, Womack, the arch-rival of GTCO-ATL and many others whom he has harmed or attempted to harm during his tenure on the board by various votes and agendas such as cell towers and his refusal to listen to those he was elected to represent.  He likened himself and the job of the school board as second most important to that of the President of the United States.  We can all sleep easier at night knowing that we will not have to hear him tell us how he was begged to return to the board or how many sacrifices he has made to take the job.  Honestly, someone who is constantly telling you that they never wanted the job in the first place is going to always be trouble because they are already in it for the wrong reasons.  We never learned what Womack's reasons for running for the board might have been, but perhaps the image of old, arrogant, white Republicans will fade from our memories as we try to build consensus among communities who want to work together to help the children and overcome the problems the board has saddled upon us.  And, may we all learn to vote responsibly from now on or run for office ourselves!  


************************************

Here's a prior speech Willie Pringle gave that addressed the cell tower issue.  Thank you, Mr. Pringle for seeing the truth and helping us call those responsible out for what they have done!


Willie Pringle from Nov. 2011:

First, giving honor to God, to the board, Dr. Atkinson, I thank God for allowing me to be here once again speaking, before our representatives.  And, I'm here standing on behalf of our children, speaking for them, the voice for those who are not able to speak.  One thing I'm standing here this evening for, I'm lookin' at, you're asking for another SPLOST.  A SPLOST that I have a problem with.  Why is that?

When I'm looking at all the money that is right now that is before us, that you all are asking for, I have a problem.  Why?  Because I'm lookin' at here, the schools in DeKalb County, I have to say, it's sad to see how we are failing our children.   We've got some good schools, but also we're lookin' at, as far I'm looking at the board, the money that we have already spent, in legal fees that are still out there, had not been accounted for, I want to know... where is the money?

 Why is that?  Because I see ya'll asking for another SPLOST IV when I'm lookin' at, as far as the teachers, the custodians, all the other employees, are not getting money, but the ones at the top are continue to get paid.  Something is wrong with this picture, people.

And, what I am looking at and seeing now, that where is my representative, I want you to know, I call on you.  For the cell towers, I told you I did not want you to support it, but you still did.  You said you didn't hear from any of your constituents.  I looked you eyeball to eyeball and said, "Do not vote on it because it were a danger to our community."  

And also, I want to know, as whereas, we got to remember, we as taxpayers have a right to know where our tax dollars are being spent. And where I'm looking at other ones that have come before me and been spent.  SPLOST IV should not go!  

Why?  Because there are still millions of dollars out there that have not been accounted for in SPLOST II and III.  So, if you want to do an audit... 6 years there has not been an audit!  Something wrong with that picture there people!  Something's wrong!

Because why?  You cannot come before the people and ask for more money when you are not being good stewards over the money that you have already received.  God is not happy.  God is not pleased with it.    

I want you to know, in closing, as far as they say a "rabble-rouser," they called Jesus the same thing.  


Note:  From Merriam-Webster online:  a Rabble-rouser is one that stirs up (as to hatred or violence) the masses of the people.