Saturday, September 15, 2012

Singer Sheryl Crow Blames Cell Phone for her Brain Tumor

From the new talk show: "Katie," hosted by Katie Couric.
From the Sept. 10, 2012, New York Daily News:

Sheryl Crow suspects that the benign brain tumor she was diagnosed with late last year was caused by cell phone use, People magazine reported.

Crow said on the new talk show Katie that doctors have not told her that her tumor was caused by cell phone use, but she has "the theory that it's possible that it's related to that. I [used to spend] hours on the old archaic cell phones."

People reported Crow, who says the tumor is in a part of her brain near where she often held her phone, says she started to suspect something was wrong when she began spacing out on stage, forgetting lyrics and generally feeling "mushy."

But is Crow right? Is it a fact that cell phones can cause cancer?

According to numerous studies and even an official classification from the World Health Organization: We're not totally sure.

The WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer said last year that cell phone radiation is "possibly carcinogenic," meaning that cell phone use might be associated with brain tumor risk, specifically for glioma.

"The evidence, while still accumulating, is strong enough to support a conclusion and the 2B classification," Dr. Jonathan Samet, a scientist at the University of Southern California who chaired the working group, said in a statement.

From KTLA in Los Angeles: 
Can the Radiation from Cell Phones Cause Cancer?

Doctors say you should limit cell phone use around children as their developing brains are not fully developed and they are more susceptible to cancer.

Monday, September 10, 2012

T-mobile’s Time in DeKalb County Runs Out

Photo credit:  sabotagefilmgroup.com

Residents near the Margaret Harris
Comprehensive School were among
the many who opposed the cell towers
as soon as they learned what the
DeKalb BOE was attempting to do
to their small residential area as well
as the disabled children who come to
their school from all over DeKalb County.
Cell Tower Opponents Claim Victory!
 (click headline for full story and links to relevent video)

At GTCO-ATL, we have been following this controversy since we first learned about it in May 2011.  However, if you have news or information to share that we are not aware of that might help us complete the full picture of this attempt by the DeKalb County School Board to deceive the public as well as go around our commissioners, please email us at sayno2celltowers@yahoo.com.  Your name will not be published.


According to GTCO-ATL’s understanding of the T-mobile contract, and professional opinion of several attorneys we have consulted with regarding this matter, the extended deadline for T-mobile to secure permits and complete construction has passed. 

(please click headline for more...)

What does this mean?  Well, as long as everyone is following the letter of the law, it appears that no cell towers will be going up at ANY of our DeKalb County public schools, at least not in the immediate future under the agreement that was voted on during the infamous July 11, 2011 work session.

It was just prior to the board's vote that then-Interim Superintendent Ramona Tyson checked with the school system's legal council and confirmed that the "official signature would be affixed" to the contract on the next business day following the vote.  And, then-Director of Facilities Steve Donahue, a former principal with an admittedly limited amount of experience or knowledge of the construction industry, confirmed to the board that T-mobile would have two periods of "due diligence" of six months each.  That would mean the ending of these two periods would have been July 12, 2012, a full year after the contract was approved and signature affixed.

Therefore, if Mr. Donahue was being truthful about the contracts' contents, and we believe he was because we have read the contract carefully and it is consistent with his remarks, then the public property at each of the 9 schools is no longer legally available to T-mobile for the purpose of operating or placing a telecommunications tower.

And, it is a good thing these towers were not approved as the documents that Steve Donahue DID review and post publically were out of date.  The towers being planned for our schools were not up to the specifications required by the industry and would have a higher liklihood of falling over under certain wind conditions as they were planned with "Rev F" technology which is outdated.  The industry now supports "Rev G" or higher.  We  hope this, among other factors, and the local zoning laws were the reasons that any applications, if they were ever submitted, were not approved by the CEO of DeKalb, Burrell Ellis, or the county commissioners.

Steve Donahue, Director of Facilities Management for DCSS
requests that the board approve the cell towers in July 2011.

Congratulations Get the Cell Out followers!  You have helped us every step of the way by keeping this issue in the limelight with the media, talking about it within your own neighborhoods, responding to comments on various blogs, exposing the astroturfers and blog trolls, speaking out at nearly every single school board meeting for a year straight, speaking out at multiple DeKalb County Board of Commissioners meetings and, most of all, by working together. 

We ALL did this together.  If you were personally involved in this fight, remain on alert for any construction signs, but we believe, at least for now, that the towers will not go up at ANY school in ANY neighborhood, just as our county ordinances were written to ensure. 










"There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but he must do it because Conscience tells him it is right." 

                                               -- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. 

For more inspiration from the words of Dr. King, see Wikiquotes here.


For the truth behind the T-mobile Towers:  Please read the portions of the transcript below from the school board meeting in which the vote took place and judge for yourself.

Or, click the video link below, and skip ahead to 2:42:40 in the video for the full lead-in to the discussion, or to 2:46:46 in the video for the beginning of the discussion about the permitting and construction plans and the two periods of due diligence that we believe expired on July 12 of this year.

Video link: 
http://view.liveindexer.com/ViewIndexSessionSLMQ.aspx?indexSessionSKU=lCRWdFhr4yIvXvAIzyBkTA%3d%3d
 








2:42:40 in the video:
Paul Womack
(DCSS Board Member and Filling in for Tom Bowen as Chairman for this Meeting.  Also, Chairman of the Finance Committee that initiated the cell tower request): T-mobile Wireless Placement Approval.
Steve Donahue (Director of Facilities, DCSS): names all 12 schools and asks for the approval.
Womack: Motion by Walker, Seconded by Speaks
Don McChesney (DCSS Board Member): Amendment, please. Remove Meadowview, Brockett, Medlock.
Womack:  Dr. Speaks? There’s a second. We need to vote on substitute motion first. Ms. Edler?
Donna Edler (DCSS Board Member): Could Mr. McChesney elaborate on his motion and why that is being made at this time?
McChesney:  We have heard of two communities that I’ve heard of (Brockett, Medlock), and another mentioned by a board member (Meadowview by DCSS Board Member Sarah Copeland-Woods). These communities have made it clear what they want and I’m supporting their decision.

(Later vote was 7 - 1 - 1 in favor of the ammendment with Edler against and Bowen absent.  The ammendment passed.)

2:46:46 in the video:
Pam Speaks
(DCSS Board Member):  I wanted to know whether there’s a grace period. Just because you haven’t heard from a community doesn’t mean they are in support or not in support of something. There are still people who may have concerns. Is there a window of time, that they would have a mechanism of letting the district know?

Ramona Tyson (Interim DCSS Superintendent):  Only grace period is to pull the item. I want to ask council … The way I understood is that tonight’s approval is a contract to proceed. Is that correct? (she looks at DCSS legal counsel and she gets a yes.)

Womack: I thought there was a 6 month window.

Donahue (returns to the podium):  T-mobile has 6 months to act on the request tonight. They have to do the due diligence work to go out and get the soil samples, get the proper permits, get the proper approvals, get everything approved through zoning. If that doesn’t happen in six months, we’ve allotted one option of an additional 6 months. If that doesn’t occur, whatever sites have not been permitted and constructed are no longer available to be used.


Womack:
  Uh, thank you.

Tyson:   Once the signature protocol is affixed to the contract, it is a binding contract is that correct?  (asks Gen. council and again gets a yes.)

(more discussion and then the vote, 6 - 2 - 1 in favor.  Edler, Jester opposed.  Bowen absent so recorded as abstained.)
Facts

The VOTE took place July 11, 2011. The memo to proceed was signed July 12, 2011 (as confirmed via Open Records Request by GTCO-ATL).

The end of the 1st 6 months due diligence period was Jan. 12, 2012. The end of the 2nd 6 months due diligence period was July 12, 2012.

Therefore: As of July 13, 2012: The DeKalb County local school properties agreed to by lease, but not properly permitted by the county of DeKalb, are “NO LONGER AVAILABLE TO BE USED!”

Leases No Longer Valid   

This conclusion is per Steve Donahue’s own explanation of the contract terms to the BOE at the time the vote took place. It is also backed up by facts that have been obtained by Open Records Requests by Get the Cell Out - Atlanta Chapter to the school board and/or county for the documentation that verifies these claims.

The FCC Telecommunications Act of 1996 (Sec. 704) states that a local authority cannot discriminate among providers when zoning for cell towers.  If DeKalb's school board attempts to claim that the contracts were not official until December 2011, they would be in violation of federal law by allowing T-mobile more time than other tower companies are given in order to secure their permits because we have documented proof that they were on campuses perfoming tests of the area as early as September 2011. They would (or should) be in trouble with the FCC and the federal government if they are allowing T-mobile extra time not in their contract in order to get local zoning variances approved as this is not a courtesy made available to other such companies and would be an unfair discrimination between providers.

If you see or hear of any construction at any school site that may be linked to the cell tower contracts, please report it to local law enforcement as the company on school grounds may very well be acting upon a contract that is no longer legally binding.  They may have no legal rights to be on the school grounds at all. 

You can also report the activity to GTCO-ATL and we will contact legal representation for immediate action. We can be reached at sayno2celltowers@yahoo.com.

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Ethics Update from Rep. Scott Holcomb

The following text was a part of an email sent to the "Friends of Scott Holcomb" group today, Sept. 8.  State Representative Holcomb represents District 81 and is entering his second term.  He was an early supporter of those who felt their rights were being violated by the DeKalb County School Board and he penned a letter to the Superintendent stating his concern about the manner in which the vote was handled. 
 
Get the Cell Out - Atlanta supports Rep. Holcomb's efforts to ban the gifts, free meals and other perks that the state government employees enjoy now that may influence the way they vote on issues critical to the future of our state, such as the wireless frontier and how the lives and property values of so many people may be adversely affected if it is not brought until control.
 
Thank you Rep. Holcomb for your fight to keep honesty and integrity in our government!
 
Rep. Scott Holcomb
(D - Atlanta)
REP. SCOTT HOLCOMB ON ETHICS:
"A few weeks ago, I announced my support for House Speaker David Ralston's promise to craft legislation to end all lobbyist gifts to legislators. I am pleased that the Speaker has expressed his commitment to change the way business is done in the Georgia General Assembly. The people of Georgia spoke very clearly on July 31st and Republicans and Democrats agreed on the need for reform. Every voter wants to know that legislators at the General Assembly are working on behalf of the people and not for the benefit of their own pocketbooks, frequent flyer accounts, or stomachs. Ending all lobbyist gifts is an important step in restoring public trust in government. The amount of money that lobbyists spend on elected officials is simply astonishing. I am delighted with the seriousness of the Speaker's proposal and I will be very happy to co-sponsor legislation to this effect. I would like to see the law ban overseas trips, weekend getaways to fancy resorts, golf outings, sports tickets, and even meals. As any economist will tell you, there's no such thing as a free lunch. Legislators receive per diem from Georgia's taxpayers, so they should pay for their own meals from now on.
 
"Speaker Ralston has promised to convene a study group to examine other states' best practices regarding gift bans. The group should get started right away so that legislation can be ready to go on day 1 of the next legislative session. The solution is really quite simple so it should not take long to study, draft, and implement the changes. To that end, the new law should go into effect on the day it is signed by Governor Deal. 
 
"I also urge the formation of a study group to enhance the enforcement powers of the Georgia Government Transparency and Campaign Finance Commission as part of the reform effort. These changes have the potential to make things better. I will finish my first term in January and I was amazed at how things 'work' at the Capitol. Reform is long overdue and while these measures won't fix all the problems at the Gold Dome, they should make for better policy making."

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Virtual Schools on the Horizon in DeKalb? The Answer is Yes, if State Legislators Have Their Way!

(click headline for full story)

Virtual schools and real profits: Industry shapes state policies

2:44 am September 5, 2012, by Maureen Downey

 

Will DeKalb's future classrooms look more like this?  Look out
for the upstart of more online charter schools, funded with the same
tax dollar allocations but without all that pesky overhead!  More money
for top level administrators, less money to actually help children learn.

The AJC "Get Schooled" blog (excepts in article below) shows a disturbing trend
 toward a school type that does not appear to be supported by any true results.

 

The Portland Press Herald and Maine Sunday Telegram published an impressive investigation on a trend that we are seeing in Georgia:  For-profit online k-12 schools “aiding” legislators in writing laws that create a demand and favorable climate for their product.

One of the changes pushed by the for-profit online sector: Statewide requirements that all students take at least one online course. We saw that effort here in Georgia.   Senate Bill 289 initially mandated that all Georgia high school students complete at least one online course starting in 2014.

But as passed and signed by the governor, the law says districts have to make online courses available to their students and increase options for online learning.

The law states:

The State Board of Education shall establish rules and regulations to maximize the number of students, beginning with students entering ninth grade in the 2014-2015 school year, who complete prior to graduation at least one course containing online learning.

(some text here omitted ... if interested, you can read the complete story here)

The Portland newspaper probe also looked at the performance of students taking online courses:
In Pennsylvania, where some 30,000 students are enrolled in virtual schools at an average cost of $10,000 per student, pupils scored 13 percent worse in reading and 24 percent worse in math than students at ordinary public schools, according to a 2011 study by Stanford University’s Center for Research on Education Outcomes. The researchers broke out the data for separate student groups — those poor enough to qualify for free or reduced lunch, those still learning to speak English, grade repeaters, blacks and Hispanics — and compared them to their counterparts at ordinary charter schools. “In every subgroup with significant effects,” they reported, “cyber charter performance is lower than the brick-and-mortar performance.”

The Stanford study may have helped prompt The New York Times to conduct an investigation of K12 Inc.’s virtual charter schools later that year, which concluded that the company “tries to squeeze profits from public school dollars by raising enrollment, increasing teacher workload and lowering standards.”

At the K12-managed Agora Cyber Charter School in Pennsylvania — which reportedly generated $72 million in revenues — the Times found: 
  • 60 percent of students were behind grade level in math,
  • nearly 50 percent were behind in reading and
  •  a third were not graduating on time:

“Hundreds of children, from kindergartners to seniors, withdraw within months after they enroll.”

The company spent $681,000 lobbying in the state between 2007 and the end of last year.
Whenever posters here (AJC's Get Schooled blog) question online education, industry folks complain that they are resisting innovation and defending the status quo.  But lobbyists writing laws that promote and protect the interests and profits of their industries over the well-being and welfare of taxpayers should be resisted.

The investigations by the Portland papers and The New York Times will be followed by similar exposés across the country. And the reason is simple:  For-profit education, whether k-12 or college, has two goals that can end up at odds. One is to educate students and the other is to make money. When the latter lags, the former suffers.


Online learning certainly has a growing role in education, but that role can’t be defined by the industry. It has to serve the education needs of students rather than the profit margins of providers.

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

GTCO-ATL Blog Posts Submitted to OpenCongress.org in Support of HR 6358, the Cell Phone "Right to Know" Act

(click headline for full text.)  The website for Open Congress asked for relevent blog posts in support of HR6358, the national Cell Phone "Right to Know" Act.  We submitted several of our blog posts for consideration and received the following reply via email:

From
writeus@opencongress.org

 
Aug. 28, 2012
 

Ticket #9675: relevent blog posts

Your request (#9675) has been received, and is being reviewed by our support staff.
To review the status of the request and add additional comments, follow the link below:
http://support.opencongress.org/tickets/9675


Get the Cell Out - Atlanta, Aug 28 03:06 (EDT):Relevant blog posts for HR 6358
http://www.getthecelloutatl.com/#!/2012/08/breaking-news-cellphone-right-to-know.html
http://www.getthecelloutatl.com/#!/2012/08/gao-to-fcc-its-time-to-solve-mystery-of.html
http://www.getthecelloutatl.com/#!/2012/08/letter-to-our-us-congressional-leaders.html

Monday, September 3, 2012

DeKalb School Board Draws Scrutiny; SACS Needs Our Help!



View from the audience at a DeKalb County School Board Work Session last year where some members of Get the Cell Out - Atlanta spoke up for other schools outside of their own districts in a show of unity against the board's vote to place cell towers on school grounds. 

(View this story by clicking headline)

View full AJC article here:  DeKalb school board draws scrutiny  By Ty Tagami
(reprinted in part with permission) The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Posted: 5:53 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 30, 2012

An accrediting agency wants the DeKalb County school board to answer allegations that it has mismanaged its oversight of the system and ignored key financial responsibilities.

The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) said it’s received dozens of complaints from a broad spectrum of people in DeKalb. Parents, public officials and school staffers have alleged everything from financial mismanagement to undue influence in hiring — all while the school system faces a financial crisis.

“The allegation is they’re getting involved in areas that aren’t their responsibility, and then in the areas that are their responsibility, they’re not being effective,” said Mark Elgart, president and chief executive officer of AdvancED, the parent company of SACS.

In a letter recieved by school officials Wednesday, SACS said there is “significant concern” about whether DeKalb is meeting “at least” two of five accreditation standards. SACS gave DeKalb 30 days to respond, and will then investigate and issue a report.

According to GTCO-ATL calculations, this gives us until Friday, Sept. 28, to forward letters or other forms of proof to back up what is being claimed in these allegations.  Please help us in this effort by compiling your own proof of violations of DeKalb's school policies or by writing letters that backup the claims of mismanagement and ignoring key financial responsibilities. 

You may send this information to SACS at:
 
Southern Association of Colleges and Schools
Attn:  Mark Elgart, President and CEO, AdvanceED
cc:  Mr. Paul Reviere, Chairman, SACS
Regional Headquarters
1866 Southern Lane
Decatur, Georgia 30033-4097
 
FAX: 404-679-4556 
 
You may also fill out this simple "Contact Us" form
if your comments are brief: 
 
Or, send an email to:  contactus@advanc-ed.org
 
“I don’t see where we violated any policy,” school board chairman Eugene Walker said. He said he wants to consult the 9-member school board before issuing any detailed response. He also said he needed more details than provided in the 3-page letter.

“They need to show some evidence of these things,” Walker said.

The allegations are from about 50 people over the past year, Elgart said.

SACS also has its own concerns. For instance, Elgart said, state audits over the past five years show the board spent 10 times more than it budgeted for day-to-day legal expenses — costs that were easily anticipated.

“One of the problems is the board has two law firms on retainer because they couldn’t agree on one,” Elgart said. “It is highly irregular for a school system to have two law firms doing the work of one.”
Elgart said it’s unusual for SACS to send a letter like this. It does so each year with perhaps 1 percent of the school systems in the 38 states where it operates, he said.

(For the rest of this article in the AJC, click here.)

(To read the letter from SACS in its entirety, click here.)
 
Please forward a copy of your statement (or excerpt from what you decided to send) to us
at sayno2celltowers@yahoo.com so that we may reprint it on this website
(without your name included to protect your privacy). 

Sharing your comments is optional but it will help to encourage others to do the same.  Thanks!

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Corruption in DeKalb's Planning and Permitting Departments AND Nepotism in the Elections Office

(click headline to watch video news report)

CBS Atlanta's Wendy Saltzman uncovers more corruption in DeKalb County.  Watch her recent report about the Planning and Development department accepting bribes in exchange for permitting buildings that were recently declined for permits.  So, does T-mobile hold permits for cell towers at our schools?  We are still seeking the answer to that question.





And, in the voter registration office for oversight of our elections:


Wednesday, August 29, 2012

McMahan finished with 65 percent of the vote, compared to Womack's 35 percent.


McMahan Defeats Womack In District 4 School Board Runoff
Reprinted from the Tucker Patch
with permission
click headline to view full story

By Timothy Darnell
August 21, 2012


Brighter Days
Jim, Jim, He's our Man! Our McMahan, that is!
District 4 was placed into capable hands and released from the
clutches of evil on August 21 when the voters elected Jim McMahan, a
stay-at-home Dad and active parent involved with school council and PTA. 
McMahan also has a Financial background and believes in transparency!  And, he is on the side of those
against the cell towers due to the sneaky way his opponemt tried to slip them by so many people last year.
 


Jim McMahan defeated district 4 incumbent Paul Womack on Tuesday night in the DeKalb school board runoff.

With all 26 precincts reporting, McMahan defeated Womack 65 percent to 35 percent.  During the campaign, McMahan sent Patch a clear message about where he stood, saying:

"For the fourth year in a row the school system has spent more money than the school board approved. If you feel like the school system is on the right track for academic success, vote for the incumbent. If you want your board member to get your school a cell tower, then vote for the incumbent. But, if you want the school system to focus on the students first, vote for Jim McMahan!"
Womack, the District 4 incumbent, told Patch:

"I've spoken to a great many people and found that while there is a great deal of dissatisfaction with the school board, very little of it is aimed at me. The issues creating the most concern are the school finances and the property tax millage rate. Most voters know that my record is one of cutting the budget responsibly, and opposing all property tax increases."
He added that it's important for people to turn out for Tuesday's runoff.

"If they stay home, the board members who want to continue to drag the school system down will be given free rein to spend tax dollars however they want. Nobody will ever be held accountable, and the ones who will suffer the most will be the kids we are trying to educate."
The two other District 4 challengers in the July 31 primary were Tom Gilbert and Jim Kinney, both of whom endorsed McMahan.

"It's my sincere opinion that he will do a substantially better job advocating for education than the incumbent he will replace," said Kinney.
He added Womack "played the District 4 Republicans like a cheap fiddle and they are still foaming at the mouth for more of him. The money-bags behind him must have all of their kids in private school and all of their workers in China. His call for a 'criminal investigation' was perfectly timed to catch maximum election coverage."

Sunday, August 26, 2012

T-mobile Cannot Justify a True Market "Need" for More Towers

Hey T-Mobile... It Doesn't Pay to Mess With DeKalb, Does It?

(click headline for details)

Angry, but well-behaved, parents and residents in DeKalb County, GA,
stood outside a T-mobile store in Tucker, GA, late last year to show
their disgust with the way the company and the school board worked together
to deny citizens the right to know what was being planned behind
closed doors.  The group marched up and down busy streets in the suburbs of
Atlanta and got the attention of local lawmakers and politicians.  This past July a referendum on the
ballot showed at 62% "NO" vote to cell towes on school grounds.  T-mobile is
expected to back out of its contract with the school system if its applications
for special land use and building permits are denied.



BAD NEWS (if you are T-mobile)

(click headline to read portions of this story, originally found on:  http://www.ajc.com/business/t-mobile-brings-back-1503999.html)
By PETER SVENSSON; The Associated Press:  NEW YORK — Unlimited wireless data is back. After sliding off the menu of cellphone plans, data plans with no caps are making a comeback at smaller wireless companies trying to compete with AT&T and Verizon.

Bargain basement discounts available soon
because, according to this article by the Associated
Press and printed in the Aug. 25, 2012, edition of the AJC,
T-mobile has capacity on their
network to sell... (aka, they do not have
a justified 'need' for any more towers!) 
Markus Schreiber, Associated PressFILE- In this Wednesday Sept. 19, 2007 file photo, an iPhone is displayed next to a T-Mobile sign, in Berlin. Unlimited wireless data is back. After sliding off the menu of cellphone plans, data plans with no caps are making a comeback at smaller wireless companies trying to compete with AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile USA, the nation's fourth-largest cellphone company, said Wednesday, Aug. 22, 2012, that it will start selling an unlimited-data plan again on Sept. 5, (AP Photo/Markus Schreiber, File)
 
T-Mobile USA, the nation's fourth-largest cellphone company, said Wednesday that it will start selling an unlimited-data plan again on Sept. 5, after stopping sales of such plans early last year. A day earlier, No. 5 carrier MetroPCS cut the price of its unlimited-data plan as a promotion for a limited time.

...

T-Mobile's new plan will cost $5 less than a regular data plan with 5 gigabytes of full-speed data. The advantage of the limited plan is that subscribers can turn their phones into "mobile hotspots," linking tablets and computers to the Internet through the phone. That's not allowed under the unlimited plan.
T-Mobile USA and MetroPCS may have room on their networks, giving them some leeway, at least for now, in offering unlimited data.

...
 
"The bottom line is they have capacity available to attract quite an influx of subscribers without pulling down the network," said Steven Crowley, an independent network engineering consultant.
T-Mobile USA is a unit of German phone company Deutsche Telekom AG and has 33.2 million subscribers. MetroPCS has 9.3 million.
___
August 25, 2012 03:31 AM EDT

AND... then there is this GEM...

T-Mobile losing more lucrative subscribers

T-Mobile continues to struggle to keep valuable customers, losing more than a half-million of its long-term subscribers in the three months ending in June, the company reported Thursday.
(Curtis Compton, ccompton@ajc.com)
(Curtis Compton, ccompton@ajc.com)

Competition from Verizon, AT&T and Sprint for long-term subscribers and rivalry from smaller competitors for prepaid mobile customers continue to put T-Mobile in a bind when it comes to growing its most lucrative customer base – those signing up for long-term contracts, who also tend to have the highest monthly bills.

T-Mobile, the country’s No. 4 cellphone company, said it lost 557,000 contract customers during the period but the loss was offset by gains in prepaid and wholesale customers, leaving it with a net loss of 205,000 customers overall. In the same period a year ago, T-Mobile lost 50,000 customers.

While T-Mobile’s top three competitors increased revenue from monthly fees for contract service, T-Mobile saw a 9 percent drop from the same period a year ago.

T-Mobile, however, reported its customer turnover rate fell during the quarter. The company managed to report a nearly flat second-quarter profit of $207 million, compared with $212 million in the same period a year ago. Revenue fell 3 percent to $4.9 billion.

U.S. regulators last year blocked AT&T’s buyout of T-Mobile, which is a subsidiary of Germany’s Deutsche Telekom AG.

Letter to our U.S. Congressional Leaders: H.R.6358 - Cell Phone Right to Know Act

(click headline for full text)

TO USE A SIMPLE FORM TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT:  http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h6358/show  click the blue "SUPPORT" box on the right-hand side of the page and just follow the instructions from there.  It's easy and only takes a few minutes of your time!!

You are sending this message to: Sen. John Isakson [R, GA]
Vote on Passage of H.R.6358: Not Voted Yet
Sen. Saxby Chambliss [R, GA]
Vote on Passage of H.R.6358: Not Voted Yet
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rep. Henry Johnson [D, GA-4]
Vote on Passage of H.R.6358: Not Voted Yet

We are writing as your constituents in the 4th Congressional district of Georgia.  We support H.R.6358 - Cell Phone Right to Know Act, and are tracking it using OpenCongress.org, the free public resource website for government transparency and accountability.  We are informing our members and followers of the outcome of this bill, including our efforts to contact you and ask for your support.

We want to please draw your attention to the matter of cell phone towers on school grounds as it has been in the news in DeKalb County for the past year.  We recently sent a message to our local officials and school board by a 62% "No" vote on the non-binding advisory referendum that asked if the school system should place telecommunications towers on school grounds. 

We gathered more than 1,500 signatures from all parts of the county, doing what politicians seem to be unable to do here - we united the county on this issue.  It is bipartisan, mutli-national, does not matter the economic class, the race, the connection to one particular group, religion or otherwise - those with and without children, with and without cell phones - were all against the idea of a cell phone tower near our homes, schools and especially our children.  We had three hours of public comment during three days of public hearings at the state capitol and all who showed up were wishing to speak against the cell towers.  Not one person who was not a paid lobbyist or otherwise connected to the industry showed up to speak in favor of the cell towers and many cited credible research to back up their concerns.

Our concerns regarding are largely addressed by H.R. 6358 as it calls for more local zoning control and the much needed research to address the concerns and reported effects of non-thermal, low level yet long-term radiation exposure.  Thank you for looking into how you can sign on and support this effort.  It has been two decades since the FCC has looked at its standards and much has changed in the world of technology since then, including the way we use wireless devices.  Let’s not put the financial motives of a few cloud our better judgment of what’s right and wrong, especially where children are concerned.  The World Health Organization has classified RF radiation as a possible carcinogen.  Other governments across the globe are responding with measures and precautions much more strict than our own.  Shouldn’t we look into measures of precaution and protection for the safety of our own people rather than blindly forging ahead amidst warnings from the medical community that there is much we do not know here?

All of our county commissioners penned a letter in support of our efforts to the DeKalb CEO.  And 16 of our 18 DeKalb delegation and Senators Jason Carter and Steve Hensen stood up in support of our efforts to keep the towers off school grounds.  We need your help, too.

Sincerely,

www.GETtheCELLoutATL.org

Response from The Burrell Ellis Team

From: Burrell Ellis[mailto:burrell@burrellellis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 10:10 PM
To: GTCO-ATL
Subject: Even the DCSD board says they do not want the cell towers!

(GTCO-ATL),

We are in receipt of your email and a copy has been sent forward for review, We appreciate that you have taken the time to share your thoughts. Again, thanks for your time.

Sincerely,
Ivory Dearing
The Burrell Ellis Team

GAO to FCC: It's time to solve the mystery of cell phone radiation


(click headline for full story)

Time to readdress EM radiation, say the US Government Accountability Office.

Reprint from Gears and Gadgets website:  http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/08/gao-to-fcc-its-time-to-solve-the-mystery-of-cell-phone-radiation/
by Casey Johnston - Aug 7 2012, 5:35pm EDT
Government
Mobile Computing


The US Government Accountability Office has recommended that the FCC formally reassess its limits for radio frequency exposure from cell phones, according to a report publicly released on Tuesday. The limits created in 1996 were based on data that is now two decades old, and while hundreds of studies have been conducted on the subject since, not many are useful or conclusive.

More than just ugly... could these towers be the reason for the
increase in cancer cases in the U.S. over the past 10 years?
The debate over the relationship between cell phone radiation exposure and human health has raged for over 16 years. For every seemingly solid, definitive study proving that cell phones have no appreciable effect on human health under current limits, a new batch of people would come out of the woodwork claiming debilitating radio frequency sensitivity (a psychosomatic condition, according to other studies). For every subject matter expert's attempt to reassure the public that cell phones don't cause brain tumors, a political entity would introduce legislation capping the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) of consumer mobile phones. The council of Europe and World Health Organization declared cell phones to be possible carcinogens in May 2011, and the devices continued to sell at incredible rates. Since the FCC's limits were introduced, reason and action have failed to shake hands again and again.

On Friday, Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) introduced a bill requiring cell phone manufacturers to "examine, label, and communicate adverse human biological effects associated with exposure to electromagnetic fields from cell phones and other wireless devices, and for other purposes." The problem is, there's little agreement on what the "adverse human biological effects" are, in part because no one has really created a workable definition of normal usage yet.

The GAO writes in its report

"Studies we reviewed suggested and experts we interviewed stated that epidemiological research has not demonstrated adverse health effects from RF energy exposure from mobile phone use, but the research is not conclusive because findings from some studies have suggested a possible association with certain types of tumors, including cancerous tumors."

The GAO also points out that it is difficult to separate the effects of cell phone RF radiation from other sources of ambient radiation. Furthermore, there's no precedent for the effects of low-level long-term exposure; cell phones simply haven't been around that long.

Likewise, the way we use cell phones has changed significantly since 1996. Now, we text more than we call, so phones spend less time sitting adjacent to our brains. Furthermore, in 2012 we're far more likely to keep our phones in our pockets than in 1996, when many a portable phone made cars, purses, or bags their permanent home. While some studies make a point of being absolutely clear about usage and proximity, too many rely on self-reported usage or assume usage patterns out of sync with the modern day.

Because of all these factors, GAO has formally requested that the FCC "reassess and, if appropriate, change its current RF energy exposure limit and mobile phone testing requirements related to likely usage configurations."

Maybe, finally, we'll get to the bottom of this.

What You Can Do

Communicate your support of the Cellphone Right to Know Act by contacting your Congressional leaders.  Here's how:

 
• Send this suggested letter to all members of the US House Energy and Commerce Committee.

•  Use this suggested letter regarding HR 6358 to send to your Congressional Representative.


•  Show your support for the bill at http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h6358/show 

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Welcome Jim McMahan and Melvin Johnson Into the Inner Sanctum





 

RUNOFF RESULTS:

Shocking Only to Him,

H. Paul WOMACK is OUT,

Jim McMAHAN is IN for District 4

 

In District 6,

Voters Forfeited by a "No Call / No Show" Strategy

They Put Melvin "Know the Roles" Johnson

Ahead of Parent Activist Denise McGill

 
This adds some new twists to the same old story.  The other victors this election year were Marshall Orson in District 2 who defeated incumbent Don McChesney after leaking a torrid email to the press on the heels of his outright lies to the media about the rules and outcomes as related to the SPLOST IV vote last November.  As a lawyer with a huge smirk, this will be a slippery character to keep our eyes on, for sure. 
 
And, in District 8... we know, we know, you didn't think there was going to be a District 8, right?  Well, apparently the Superdistricts still exist because Dr. Eugene Walker is now the board's chairman and he hasn't finished updating his resume, yet.  So, as we were saying... District 8's Dr. Pam Speaks barely edged out some other woman whom no one really knows and whom no one reported ever seeing or hearing.  She didn't show up for any of the forums and a computerized voice machine made all her campaign calls.  Strange, but true, is that she nearly won, but Speaks will be around for the next two years or until Dr. Walker decides to rewrite the rules again.  Stay tuned...
 
It's the start of a new day in DeKalb County, GA.  At least that is what we would like to believe.  After yesterday's school board runoff elections, we're just not sure what the next two years will be like exactly. 
 
Like all good suspense novels, the story about education, civil rights, political battle lines, corruption and scandal has been unraveled for the past several decades here in DeKalb County, GA.
 
This particular thriller, however, is non-fiction and the innocent victims are the poor, under served, mostly minority and handicapped children who do not know about the price tags being placed on their heads or the reasons why so many venture capitalists and other investors are suddenly turning attention their way.   
 
We will have more of the behind-the-scenes analysis coming up in the next week, so check back with us.
 
Don't forget that the Crawford Lewis trial will begin soon.  We will be covering that story as well.
 
You can "subscribe" to Get the Cell Out - Atlanta by selecting the email option on the right hand column of our home page.  (Hover over to reveal the toolbar.)
 
Comments are welcome.... if you see a link that says comments, below, then we would love to hear your take on this election and how your family is handling this most unusual start of the school year. 
 
 



Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Vote! Vote Like You've Never Voted Before!

Sing like no one can hear you!
Dance like no one is watching and...
Vote like you have never voted before!  We really mean it! 

No, really, it's true... even if you have never voted before, but you are registered, there is no better time than the present to get started.  Your voter card has the name of your polling loction.  Take your Driver's License or other ID, show it when you walk inside, push some buttons to vote, remember to vote for the "Mc" in your district school board race as we have directed you to with the illustration below. 

Then, get your sticker and you're done!  It's that easy!  You have just fulfilled your civic duty and it is not even noon, yet!  Now, don't you feel better?


WHAT:  Nonpartisan Runoff Election for DCSD Districts 4 and 6

WHEN:  TODAY!  Tuesday, August 21, 2012

TIME:   7 a.m. to 7 p.m. (But, make it a priority and arrive early!)

WHO:  ANYONE WHO IS REGISTERED TO VOTE IN GEORGIA

WHERE:  at Your Regular Polling Location



 If you do not want a cell tower at your school:

Lakeside, Briarlake, Sagamore, Northlake, Montreal, Brockett, Tucker (DeKalb)
School Board 4 http://web.co.dekalb.ga.us/Voter/Maps/School04.pdf  VOTE JIM MCMAHAN


Idlewood (Tucker), Smoke Rise, Stone Mountain, Stephenson, Redan
School Board 6 http://web.co.dekalb.ga.us/Voter/Maps/School06.pdf  VOTE DENISE MCGILL

Monday, August 20, 2012

DCSD Score Card for Your Feedback... You Know, Because if They Let You Vent, They Think You Might Feel Better

School System Seeks Feedback
(please click headline for full details)

The DeKalb County School District has released a draft of its balanced scorecard and is seeking feedback from the community. The scorecard outlines the measures used to gauge progress in each of the five areas of the district's five-year strategic plan.

 Well, for the percentage of the population that believes in psycho-therapy or self-help, then perhaps the DeKalb County School System's new "scorecard" will be a way to relieve stress.  Don't worry, if you are not sure how to answer, we are pretty certain you can ask for help from other members of your family and they will not really consider it cheating.

Just have them cough once for A, twice for B and so on.  If it sounds complicated, just ask your kid to teach you how it's done.  You didn't think they wasted ALL that Title I fund money, did you?  Some of it had to pay for a few after-school tutors so that there were not any eyebrows raised.  Or, should we say any MORE eyebrows raised.  Let us know when we are allowed to lower them, okay?  We are afraid ours might be stuck this way!

The message from Dr. Cheryl Atkinson regarding the scorecard went something like this:

"Blah, blah, blah, accountability.  Yadda, yadda, yadda.  Blah, blah, transparency," said Dr. Cheryl Atkinson, Superintendent of DCSD who could not be reached at press time to let us know if we were going to be leaving her middle initials in or out with this press release.  "Yeah, Yeah, Yeah, we know.  Blah, blah, blah-blah-whatever."
Atkinson also stated, "When is my driver going to get here?" and then "I have a standing appointment to have my hair done once a week and he knows how I hate to be late for important matters of that nature!  Now, where was I?  (dramatic pause, and then...)  Oh yes! Blah, blah, victory in every classroom."
 The scorecard, available here, includes measures for content mastery at the elementary, middle and high school levels, as well as measures for personnel, operations, school safety and communication.   

And no, they do not care that the file is still called "draft" in the naming convention.  They probably do not even know what a naming convention is, but they will plan to use plenty of expense account dollars planning to attend one if we tell them where it is being held this year!


Feedback from the DeKalb County community is encouraged.  Biting off your own hand to prevent yourself from typing nothing but expletives is not recommended, but may qualify the school district to a few extra state or federal grants if you will report it to them promptly. 

Comments may be sent to bsc-feedback@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us.   Yeah, good luck with that.

Sunday, August 19, 2012

Get Out the Vote! It is Super Tuesday This Week for DeKalb Schools!




DISTRICT 4 - if you live here, your vote is NEEDED on Tuesday, August 21st.   Return to your polling place that morning and vote again, this time you will vote only for the runoff candidate in the Board of Education races whom you wnat to represent you for the next two years.  And,  yes, YOU CAN VOTE in this election EVEN IF you missed the last one.



(click headline for full story)
Dear Get the Cell Out - Atlanta followers:


If you live in the School District #4  (see map) or even if you know someone who does, please make a note that this coming TUESDAY (Aug. 21) is a very big day.  It is the date of the RUNOFF election between two candidates for the Board of Education.

Here are the area voting precincts:  Briarlake Elem, Brockett, Brockett Elem, Dresden Elem, Embry Hills, Evansdale Elem, Hawthorne Elem, Henderson Mill Elem, Hugh Howell, Lakeside High, Livsey Elem, Midvale Elem, Midvale Road, Montreal, Northlake, Oak Grove Elem, Oakcliff, Pleasandale Elem, Rehoboth, Sagamore Hills Elem, Skyland, Smoke Rise, Tucker, Tucker Library, Valley Brook, Warren Tech.


From Briarlake to Smoke Rise and the very large voting district that includes Tucker and Brockett, here are a few reasons WHY this RUNOFF ELECTION is even MORE IMPORTANT than the last election you just voted in. 


1.  THIS election on Tuesday is all about YOU... YOUR AREA.  Your friends, neighbors, children, parents - everyone you know who lives near you or has children at your neighborhood school is counting on you to get this vote right!


2.  The value of YOUR home can rise and fall as a result of the decisions made by the Board of Education.  And, mostly, they have been falling.

Read what a Real Estate professional in Tucker, Jessica Crocker, had to say recently:

 
"According to the National Association of Realtors, 75% of buyers consider the quality of neighborhood schools either 'somewhat important' or 'very important.'
The proof is in the pudding. If you research home sales statistics in neighborhoods with 'preferred' schools, you'll see homes that sell quickly - and for great prices."


This should be of particular concern to the residents of Tucker (the DeKalb County side) including the areas from Brockett to Livsey and Evansdale, Smoke Rise in Stone Mountain (very near the border of Tucker) and those of you who live near Briarlake Elementary School in unincorporated DeKalb portion of Decatur. 

Why?  Because one of the candidates, H. Paul Womack, who is the incumbant, has already tried to harm your area as he seeks to help his political friends and big business lobbyist buddies affiliated with Lakeside High School's booster club.  By aiming to help T-mobile place cell phone towers on the campuses of Brockett Elementary School, Smoke Rise Charter School, Briarlake Elementary School and even Lakeside High School itself were among the 12 schools originally on a list to receive huge 60' x 60' cell phone towers that extend 150' in the air.

Womack does not seek to service his district, he seeks to help the business interests and public utilities whom he owes many favors.  He plans to retire after this two year term.  There is no telling what damage he can do in this time frame if he is re-elected. 


3.  Schools will be closed in favor of mega schools that cost less, and provide an impersonal approach to school.  This idea of corporate running of our schools flies in the face of what has always worked well in the past - caring, concerned teachers who are able to find what works for each child so they can help them tap into their inner strength.  We've never met a bubble sheet capable of doing that, yet. 

If you do not vote for Jim McMahan, the involved parent running against Womack in District #4 or if you simply do not vote at all, there is a very good chance that many of our historic public elementary schools, in the middle of our neighborhoods, will be closed.  Womack has already worked with the current board members in an attempt to close Livsey, Brockett, Idlewood and others. 

If you agree that a cell tower in your neighborhood would drastically reduce your property value, then think about this:  try having a cell tower that leads to your school getting closed, to.  The harm something like that would bring to a community has never been considered.  The loss in revenue to the school system from the further decline in property values would negate any benefit that could come from the very little money that Womack negotiated the deal for in the first place. 


4.  Current decisions made by the BOE have simply wasted our money.  Womack's own involvement in the cell tower issue created a diversion by the board when they should have been focused on finding a new Superintendent of schools.  It even distracted Womack from doing his own job, as he reported that $104 million was cut from the budget in the year 2010 when he was the head of the Budget Committee, yet in 2011 when he was focused on the cell tower issue, he failed to notice that the school administration was not carrying out any of the cuts that had been ordered. 

This failure to oversee the administration and failure to sanction the Interim Superintendent Ramona Tyson (and instead reward her with a huge bonus) is what directly led to the buget crsing the board was presented with this year.  The para-professionals, teachers, librarians, security and other resource personnel who lost their jobs can thank Mr. Womack for failing to keep an eye on the day to day operations of the school system.  Since Womack has already announced his plans to retire, before changing his mind and running for re-election another term, he is much less likely to be connected to the real people and real concerns in his district. 

GTCO-ATL members can tell a variety of personal stories that would back up this claim.  Mr. Womack, it has been said, does not return phone calls, emails or even address concerns directed toward him during the public comments portion of many board meetings.  He does not acknowledge or understand the damage his lack of ethics and concern has caused many children and many schools.

Womack's cell tower plan even included a school, Margaret Harris, for disabled children who are in one of the most vulneratble populations with regard to harm that can be caused by a cell tower.  Instead, he got his local school, Corralwood, a pre-school that is not even required education under federal laws, a 10.5 million dollar upgrade while Margaret Harris will get next to nothing and a cell tower on campus.

5.  The school board is a non-partisan race.  There are people of both major parties as well as the DeKalb Green party who have all come fortward to state their objection to cell towers and the process by which the lease for school grounds was approved. 

You have a choice about the type of person whom you want to represent you - the values of this part of the county that you call home.  Will your elected board member make you proud, or will you be embarassed to tell people where you are from?  Is this the type of person you would like to see your district attract?


5.  The children of DeKalb have been dropping out or failing at an alarming rate.  The schools are in disarray and teachers are being forced out.  Our school system has even been ranked as low as the worst performing district in the entire U.S. and we are frequently the largest district at the bottom of the list in graduation rates and test scores in Georgia.  We cannot afford two more years of the harmful decision making that the current District #4 representative has been involved with, supported and defended.


TUCKER - BRIARLAKE - BROCKETT - SMOKE RISE - LAKESIDE - SAGAMORE


YOU HAVE A CHOICE

and we think it should be a pretty simple one: 


Jim McMahan - a refreshing change, an involved parent, a business background combined with stay-at-home parenting skills, accessible, accountable.  This is the candidate who has the qualities most people want to see on that school board, representing them proudly!  He has spent several years working with school councils, the PTA and other activist groups in his neighborhood and has a plan that would expand that program to include all schools in District #4 and potentially al schools in DeKalb.  He talks about ways that the Board of Education can improve their transparency and has made a vow to remain loyal and easily acessable to the families he serves. 


His opponent (the incumbant) - three decades in the school system with ties to the folks who have nearly caused it to completely collapse.  This would be more of the same, which no one wants.  H. Paul Womack and some of his supporters believe his years in the DeKalb School administration is what makes him the best person for the job.  They do not understand that his lack of understanding or compassion for all the children and his insistance on funnelling resources only to one small area of the district IS a major contributor to the overall educational declnes in the entire county.

Friday, August 17, 2012

Make the Effort that will Make the Difference! Get Out and Vote on Tuesday!

THIS IS SCHOOL DISTRICT 6.  If you live here, then please return to your polling place, even if you did not vote in the last election.  You can take part in the RUNOFF ELECTION.  Please help elect Denise McGill for this very critical position to ensure our schools are safe from cell towers and our children get the educaiton they deserve!

(click headline for full story)
Dear Get the Cell Out - Atlanta followers:

If you live in the School District #6  (see map) or even if you know someone who does, please make a note that this coming TUESDAY (Aug. 21) is a very big day.  It is the date of the RUNOFF election between two candidates for the Board of Education.

From Stone Mountain to Redan and *now including the Idlewood Elementary School area* here are a few reasons WHY this RUNOFF ELECTION is even MORE IMPORTANT than the last election you just voted in. 

1.  THIS election on Tuesday is all about YOU... YOUR AREA.  Your friends, neighbors, children, parents - everyone you know who lives near you or has children at your neighborhood school is counting on you to get this vote right!

2.  The value of YOUR home can rise and fall as a result of the decisions made by the Board of Education. 

From the electronic appraiser:




"Some of the other pieces of data that are likely to be examined by the Stone Mountain appraisal may include items such as appearance of a property, the neighborhood, the location and quality of schools and shopping in the areas surrounding the property in question."

So, if you get the wrong person and your local school starts to slide in terms of performance or even gets closed because the board member does not really care, your property value can be harmed. 

3.  A cell tower in your neighborhood would drastically reduce your property value.  A failing or abandoned school would do the same.  We compiled a lot of information to prove this point in an earlier article, found here.  But, what about a shuttered and boarded up school with a cell tower?  The harm something like that would bring to a community has not even been factored. 

4.  Current decisions made by the BOE have simply wasted our money.  You have a choice about the type of person whom you want to represent you - the values of this part of the county that you call home.  Will your elected board member make you proud, or will you be embarassed to tell people where you are from?  Is this the type of person you would like to see your district attract?

5.  The children of DeKalb have been dropping out or failing at an alarming rate.  The schools are in disarray and teachers are being forced out.  Our school system has even been ranked as low as the worst performing district in the entire U.S. and we are frequently the largest district at the bottom of the list in graduation rates and test scores in Georgia.

STONE MOUNTAIN - REDAN - IDLEWOOD ...

YOU HAVE A CHOICE
and we think it should be a pretty simple one: 

 Denise McGill - a refreshing change, an involved parent, an honest business background, accessible, accountable.  This is the candidate who has the qualities most people want to see on that school board, representing them proudly!  She comes from a family that values a good, honest education and she can plainly see, just like you and I can, what needs to be fixed.

Her opponent - three decades in the school system with ties to the folks who have nearly caused it to completely collapse.  This would be more of the same, which no one wants.  Marvin Johnson believes his years in the DeKalb School administration is what will make him a decent board member.  He does not understand that the administration IS what is wrong with the system.  

Please review the announcement below from Ms. McGill and remember to
VOTE VOTE VOTE on TUESDAY, Aug. 21
Go to your regular polling location.
It's open 7 a.m. - 7 p.m.
but plan to go first thing in the morning as
you never know what might pop up during the day
... traffic, meetings, phone calls, you know the drill.
If you make the vote the first priority of the day then you can forget about it
for the rest of the day.  Then, you can sit back and listen for the results later that evening.

Hopefully you will hear good news and
you will know you made the effort that made the difference!

It's time to right this sinking ship! 

****    *****    ****   ****  EVERY VOTE COUNTS!    *****     ***  ****   **** 

"Sucess is not final; failure is not fatal.  It is the courage to continue that counts."
                                                   -- Winston Churchill



THANK  YOU EVERYONE FOR YOUR SUPPORT OF THIS CAMPAIGN.  YOU HAVE BEEN A GODSEND AND THE KEY TO KEEPING ME IN THIS RACE.

WE COULD NOT HAVE COME THIS FAR without  friends, family, and supporters like you- We ran a lean campaign during the first election. Our total expenses through the first election  were a mere $4,930.64.  That's Unheard of and is an INCREDIBLE accomplishment considering our competition as well as the amount of funding it takes to have a successful campaign!

WE HAVE FOUR DAYS BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THIS RUN OFF ELECTION-  AND WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT- CAN WE COUNT ON YOU FOR THIS LAST DITCH EFFORT OF SUPPORT?

Please ask your friends, canvass your neighbors, or kindly help us by making a contribution through our website. We are utilizing every dollar earned towards notifying voters about the importance of this vote.

Donations may be made at:
http://www.thepeoplefordenisemcgill.org/Contact-Us.html

Thanking you in Advance!

VOTE

Denise E. McGill
DeKalb County School Board District 6

TUESDAY, AUGUST 21, 2012
Early Vote and Absentee Vote Options Available