Showing posts with label protesters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label protesters. Show all posts

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Quality Life For DeKalb - No Cell Tower On School Grounds


Viola Davis (RNwhocares@gmail.com) wanted to share this with you.

Please send CEO Burrell Ellis a message to unify with DeKalb BOC and uphold our local laws and ordinance by denying a permit to construct cell towers on school grounds.

In the Northlake / Tucker area back in Januay, residents protested outside T-mobile's store to show their anger at
the decision to put cell towers at 9 local schools, next to homes and without the input of the community.
Quality Life For DeKalb - No Cell Tower On School Grounds
by RNwhocares

Memo
To:        CEO Burrell Ellis
From:    Viola Davis
CC:       Unhappy Taxpayer & Voter, Get The Cell Out Atlanta, Concerned Citizens of South DeKalb, Citizens for a Healthy and Safe Environment, DeKalb NAACP, No Briarlake Tower.org, Briarcliff Heights Community Action Group, No Cell Tower Fund.com, and all appropriate parties
Date:    4/3/2012
Re:       Quality Life For DeKalb - No Cell Tower On School Grounds

Quality Life For DeKalb – No Cell Tower On School Grounds

One DeKalb Lives ... restore neighborhoods and build hope.  One DeKalb Works ... create jobs and also build hope.  These are the two DeKalb logos on the front page of the county website.  However, One DeKalb has a “new message.”

We are proud to join the basic message of One DeKalb to say that parents and homeowners from North and South DeKalb have sent a unified message that we do not want cell towers on school grounds and request CEO Burrell Ellis deny any applications for construction of cell towers on school grounds.

We are contacting CEO Ellis to move the One DeKalb political logo and slogan into a public issue action plan.  

North and South DeKalb have united to send a clear message that we do not want cell phone towers on school grounds especially within residential neighborhoods.  We have collectively petitioned our elected officials to pass laws to protect our children, protect our neighborhoods, and protect our overall quality of life.

Parents and Homeowners throughout DeKalb County take pride in the following facts:
  • The entire Board of Comm issioners has taken a position on cell towers on DeKalb school properties to not ignore its ordinances unless it has been proven in court.
  • Rep. Karla Drenner introduced HB1128, entitled “Prudent Avoidance,” and received the support of 16 out of 18 signatures from the DeKalb Delegation.

DeKalb County has not seen this level of unity before in the history of any given issue and look forward to our CEO joining this history making venture. 

We request CEO Burrell Ellis join the DeKalb Board of Commissioners to uphold our local zoning law.  We ask CEO Burrell Ellis to prove One DeKalb is more than a political slogan by joining the Board of Commissioners to send a message to T-Mobile that DeKalb deserves a high quality of life and that quality starts and ends with upholding our local laws and ordinances.
  
Time to Take Action:  Please write, email and/or phone CEO Burrell Ellis and request he join the Board of Commissioners and DeKalb Delegation to send T-Mobile a message that “it is the policy of DeKalb County to prohibit cell towers on single-family residentially-zones properties” and “this zoning ordinance was established to ensure the safety of county residents and to protect property values of single-family homes” as quoted from Crossroads Newspaper.

Contact CEO Burrell Ellis:

CEO Burrell Ellis
Chief Executive Officer
DeKalb County Government
330 W. Ponce de Leon Avenue, 6th Floor
Decatur, GA 30030

Copy (Optional) to:
For extra assurance your letter of support
reaches the right people, you may wish to send a copy to:

The Director of Public Works
The Director (or Interim Director) of Planning & Sustainability
The Chief of Staff for the Office of Community Relations.

Phone Numbers:
404-371-2881 Executive Office
404-371-2521 Neighborhood Empowerment
404-371-6301 Scheduling Line


Contact Your County Commissioners
Please send an e-mail/letter thanking the entire Board of Commissioners for their stand and letting them know that we are making our concerns known to Burrell Ellis.

Tell your district representative (or all of them) you are taking the next step to ensure the CEO knows the letter they penned is also backed by the wishes of the people of DeKalb County.

Contact details can be found here: http://web.co.dekalb.ga.us/boc/contact.html.
Attend a BOC Meeting
If you have not already, please take a morning, attend and speak at one of the BOC meetings which occur twice a month. They are held beginning at 9:00 AM on the second and fourth Tuesdays of every month.

This is an important opportunity for you as a citizen in DeKalb County to participate in the county’s operation. These meetings have been extremely educational and experiential for all who have taken the time. 

BOC Meetings are held at the Maloof Auditorium at 1300 Commerce Drive in Decatur.

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Q: Where is the WORST Place to Put a "Telecommunications Tower" ?


A:  ... On the July 2012 Primary Election Ballot! 

(we would alternately accept the answers:  on the Nov. 2012 Presidential Ballot or on any Ballot in the state of Georgia)

(click headline to read why)

Not sure why anyone would debate why one school is “worse” as far as a location than another, but perhaps from an eyesore or danger standpoint, every single school has taxpaying citizens who live nearby and have been wronged by this decision. And there are plenty more who do not know.

If Get the Cell Out – Atlanta did not form in order to warn everyone about what had taken place and what to expect, every school on the list would have very likely been blindsided – learning about the tower only when they wake up early in the a.m. to the sound of construction, walking to the tower site to ask what is being built and learning about the new environmental hazard the school system has approved and railroaded through the zoning process without a second thought about local ordiances or zoning laws.

And, the new anti-picketing law in Ga. was designed to make it a felony if those people here were to do any of the typical things that people in this same exact situation do – stand in front of the entrance to the job site to try to stop the construction workers from getting through while they desparately send other neighbors home to call police or attorneys or get in touch with someone at the school to find out what is going on. These people would be fined $1,000 a day for exercising their right to protest in their own neighborhood, a right guaranteed by the U.S. constitution.

As for Briarlake, are they making a mistake by letting their PTA run their opposition?  At other schools, the PTA has been identified as being part of the reason the initial reports of the cell tower plans were kept so quiet.  Recently, they warned residents to set their "No cell tower" signs back 10' from the road and into their own yards.  This advice is not an innocent warning.

With school board member Paul Womack living right there in the same neighborhood, those signs, when placed 10′ away from the curb and into one’s own yard, will constitute a formal “picket” and every individual is at risk of being fined $1,000, maybe more if they have not submitted a request for a sign permit and have it affixed to the back of the sign.  Or, as a group, the No Tower Briarlake, LLC, could be fined $10,000 a day for those signs so there goes any money in the legal fund!

And, if a tower application is filed, the organizers of the protest, protected under their “LLC,” will have only 15 days to file any legal action from the date the application is submitted.   That's half the time an individual would have.  As a group, it may be required that they are represented by an attorney.  But, any individual can appeal an application up to 30 days from the date it is submitted.

If brought within the timeframe (15 days for a group or 30 for an informal group of individuals or a single person), the attorney fees will likely be refunded at the end of the court proceedings, regardless of outcome, because it is guaranteed as a right under the FCC Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Act attempts to deal with all “obstacles to smooth entry” into an area, so they give this incentive to encourage anyone who wants to bring legal action to do so, but within the relatively short timeframe.

Those I-pads will be all the justification that T-mobile will need to show that the new 4G technology tower really was needed for educational purposes all along – and then it will be exempt from zoning regulation. The county citizens need to work together rather than listening to different perspectives that will lead to different results.

To compare one’s school to another when you consider the fact that the biggest concern at the heart of this matter is the fear that long-term exposure to RF radiation may cause cancer and children are the most vulnerable  (followed by unborn children, the elderly, then those with compromised mmune systems, then women and finally men).  Everyone exposed to the unknown effects of being near a cell tower for many hours a day is taking part in the largest human experient in the history of mankind.

Think what you want, but this is not an issue that we can debate – the science of this issue must work itself out and will take time – probably 15 to 30 years, about the length of the contracts. To subject any human being to this type of research, but especially to do this to children, against their will and without the consent or input of their parents will be a tragedy we hope our county is strong enough and wise enough to avoid.

Please, don’t let your school board do what it always does to all of you – don’t let them divide you into bickering little factions where you start to blame each other and then find ways to ask for favors behind each other's backs.  That is the grease of politics, but we must leave that for the politicians and the lobbyists. We must be loyal to the humanity inside of all of us that says, “I wouldn’t want this in my yard. Why would I be okay with it in anyone’s yard?"

There must be a better way – tell T-mobile to take their money back to the drawing board because we do not want to impose this great of a risk on any human being and we do not wish to punish these 9 schools, their communities or anyone else with an eyesore and a burden that they should be legally protected from.

If handled correctly, THIS ISSUE could actually HELP DeKalb bring new homebuyers to our county if word gets out that we decided to put the health of our children and residents first.  We don't need an outright ban (such as the one denied by the state legislature even with support of 16 of 18 of our delegates) to know that we, collectively, do not approve of the practice of cell towers on school grounds.

You may have heard Tom Bowen, former school board chairman, in the press flippantly stating that this is "common" because it has already taken place in Fulton and Gwinnett.  So what?  Good for them.  The big difference is that they made their "deal with the devil" before the World Health Organization legitimized the concerns about the health risks and confirmed that brain cancer has increased in multiple studie that looked at exposure to RF radiation for more than 10 years. 

If we say no where other counties have said yes, that will only make DeKalb more attractive and improve ALL of our home values even more. And, the entire country will be learning from us about how to be good neighbors, good citizens and good parents.

We Need Your Help!

EMAIL OR WRITE:   The CEO Mr. Burrell Ellis, to back up the fact that we are counting on him to follow the advice of the county commissioners since they are well trained and experienced in these matters: 
Mr. W. Burrell Ellis, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
(can approve a Special Administrative Permit)
(Can influence all permits)

c/o DeKalb County Government
Executive Office --     (404) 371 - 2881
330 W. Ponce de Leon Avenue, 6th Floor
Decatur, GA  30030


His recent speaking tour was entitled, "DeKalb County - Making Your Priorities Our Priorities."  So, let's put that slogan to the test!  If it is true and his office really does want to make our priorities the priorities that count, Mr. Ellis might have a better chance at re-election that many may have expected. 


DeKalb County Director of Public Works
(can approve a Special Administrative Permit - usually for tempoary structures)
Director’s Office –             (404) 371-4778     
http://www.co.dekalb.ga.us/publicwrks/pw_who.html

The Zoning Board of Appeals
(can approve a Special Exception Permit) 
The Director (or Interim Director) of Planning & Sustainability
Director’s Office –             404-371-2155     
email: planDev@dekalbcountyga.gov

The Director of Planning & Sustainability
(can approve a Special Land Use Permit)
(which would then go to the commissioners for sign-off).


Thank you for reading this far into this article.  We wish we could keep comments brief, but this issue is complex and very important. Please tell everyone you know about it so that we can keep it in the forefront of everyone’s minds when they go to the ballot boxes and with any luck they will understand the importance of voting responsibly this year.

A single cell tower at a single school sets a dangerous precedent. If it happens here the way it has happened elsewhere, the money will go for a slush fund for prinicpals and top administrators. It will not do any good for any child or any school. Look what it has done already to the credibility of the PTA.

Womack knows that Lakeside will not get a tower. They do not even have a signed lease right now. He tried to do this same thing in the late 1990s (from what we have been told from several sources) and the community stopped it. Lakeside doesn’t care about the towers – they need the money to finish their construction because SPLOST III funds ran out.

This is where the money will go and the big winners will be AT&T because they will likely be the owners of T-mobile’s towers and making tons in the subleasing to other providers alone and the avoidance of property taxes. This was a bad deal from the beginning and we should not let it rub off on us – rise above it. Do the right thing for the COUNTY, not just your school. Do the right thing for all the children. If the roles were reversed, I bet the children would choose to do the right thing for you.

DISCLAIMER:  THIS IS A BLOG:  a Web site that contains an online personal journal with reflections, comments, and often hyperlinks provided by the writer; also: the contents of such a site.  (as defined by Merrim-Webster) 

COMMENT:  Yes, we know that sometimes we might be speculating or ruffling a few feathers, but that's what we are here for.  We are just trying to get to the truth.  And when your governement and school board shuts you out of the meetings where you may have learned what they were doing or why, you are left with nothing but pure speculation.  And often, when one fact is uncovered, it leads down the path to another lie which must be exposed if we will ever be sucessful.

Everything we have stated is based in fact or complete reprints of what answers we received.  It is our intention to help the public by providing the transparency we all seek, yet are often denied.  When we do not know the answers, we say so.  When we are trying to figure things out, we share our thoughts.  We are all in this together and no one really knows how this battle will turn out.  Except perhpaps T-mobile or ATT... they have done this many, many times before and they have already moved on in other parts of the U.S. to public parks and other grounds that are willing to provide them locations for their towers, tax breaks and access to areas that are closer and closer to our homes. 

4G technology isn't all it is cracked up to be when you realize the loss of your own privacy that might come along with it.  We hope you do not give up this fight to get to the truth.  Our children and our future is worth every bit of effort you are willing to put into it.  And it is our combined efforts that will, we hope, lead to the success of this movement to keep our children safe and place the focus on education - where it should be.  We hope our county and our country will be able to rise above those who wish to keep us at odds with one another.  We hope more people will learn how important it is that they register to vote, learn the issues, make informed choices and get out there and VOTE! 

If you will not be here for the election at the end of July, please request an away-ballot NOW so you can still have your voice counted!

Commissioners Story Makes Front Page News AND School Board Meeting Recap from April 9

Click headline to view this full story which includes short rundown on some items from the
April 9 School Board meeting. 

Click the caption link to view the interactive version of the CrossRoads print edition. 

http://www.crossroadsnews.com/view/full_story/18055161/article-Commissioners-give-thumbs-down-to-cell-towers-at-school


Update regarding the April 9, 2012, school board meeting. 

FIRST:  There was discussion regarding the building of iPad study labs at two of the county's lowest performing schools using Race to the Top dollars provided by the federal governement.  The total cost = $439,458 paid to Apple Computers, a single source vendor (no competitive bids).  Great questions were posed about the reasoning behind using technology to improve school performance rather than other concepts like lower student / teacher ratios.  In the end, thought, the items went to a vote and was approved.  It did sound like there was a demand for follow-up and reporting on performance before and after the labs start up to look for any correlation between the use of the technology and the performance of the students. 

The Superintendent said that if teachers were hired then they would likely have to be only on staff for the length of time of the grant.  That's a pretty bold statement to make since she was speaking about cutting them, even if they had been effective.  Makes you wonder why the iPad technology isn't considered in the same light... if it can't contribute to the learning, then why keep it?  Or, even more to consider, if the federal grant is the only way the school can afford the iPads and later they become outdated, then who will pay to replace them?  Or, even more urgently, who will pay if one or more of these items which are, duh, wireless, happens to walk off?  Nancy Jester made a great comment that went something like this:

"We have a habit in this distrcit of saying that we are self-insured when we're not.  Self-insured only means we are responsible for our own debt if something is lost or stolen.  And if we haven't budgeted anything in case that happens, we're really just saying we're not insured at all."

SECOND:  There was talk about an eavesment needed by Georgia Power for the Atlanta International School on Briarcliff at North Druid Hills Road.  Those wishing to legally oppose the cell towers should find out about any public hearings that will be helf for the construction of this eavesment as it is likely to be tied into the additinal power and access roads needed to service the cell towers.  If the county approves these eavesments then that is a good indication that they plan to approve the cell towers, no matter what it says in the newspaper and no matter what they said in their letter.

Just because it appears that some people have stepped up to do the right thing, we cannot count on them to follow-through.  The cell companies have more money than God and are willing to throw it around to get what they want out of our communities.  They can be very influential and can stretch the truth to suit their own needs. 

If you have not done so already, please voice your concerns to your Board of Education member, you elected Board of Commissioners member and your school principal, whether or not your school is currently under consideration for a cell tower.  We need to be pro-acive so that these issues cannot "slip by" anyone ever again.

GTCO-ATL will submitting another Open Records Request in the next day or two in order to gain more insight into whether or not the T-mobile meetings qualify as the pubic's chance to provide input into the decision.  We will post any new information,  or copies of our letters on this website.

THIRD:  Whether or not we are able to help the citizens of DeKalb County stop the cell towers on our school grounds, we hope we have at least provided some attention to the way the school board members can get lazy at their primary job of education our children.  When they are all caught up in their big-time construction projects and satisfying major business goals for their friends, they lose sight of why they are there in the first place. 

It was great to hear Jesse Cunningham speaking up for MLK and the fact that they have been overlooked so many times with the SPLOST dollars and he didn't want to see that happen again.  It was great to her the Superintendent reassure Sarah Copeland-Woods that ALL the students are important and that a committee should not have to have every district represented on it by way of a board member or community member who severs, but that every committee member should be doing their job to ensure a quality education for children at all levels and in every school.

Eugene Walker and Paul Womack were quietly giving the evil eye to each other which is typical.  Walker even said "thank you, Mr. Womack, for that most unwelcomed input" when Womack spoke out of turn. Pam Speaks should learn to speak up more often because when she does, she usually has very valid concerns and good questions.  She just approaches her comments from an apologetic standpoint right off the bat which erodes the confidence she might gain if she were willing to be more direct.  She DID ask about other ways that community members could speak up if they were opposed to the cell towers and had just not been informed (like we were telling htem was the case).  Unfortunately, Womack and Steve Donahue led that question astray as they pretended to understand the process and what T-mobile would do next.  What happened, in reality, was that there was no other way to speak up .  The July meeting sealed the deal and the board does not want to look back. 

However, they did  discuss OTHER forms of technology not dependent on iPADs and therefore not reliant on cell towers!  That was good!  Perhaps it means that they are less than optimistic about the county approving the cell tower appplications!  We can only hope!   Well, that and we can keep asking the questions until we get some answers.  Our focus right now is about how our hopes for a bill to ban cell towers has morphed into a survey question designed to trick people into saying yes so they can give the CEO the thumbs up to approve the cell towers, um, we mean.... telecommunications towers.  We're asking the Governor to VETO this ridiculous referendum for its faulty wording and it's abiliy to undercut the power of our commissioners to speak on behalf of theit own districts.

And Nancy Jester was on fire!  It was obvious that she is getting tired of asking for information and answers and not getting anywhere.  It was obvious that others, like Mr. Cunningham, are tired of the staff being humiliated when they come before the board and don't have the answers.  The overstaffed administrative office of this school board should be nervous.  There are a lot of angry parents and taxpayers out there who want someone to blame.  While the school board is the most visible, they also rely upon a lot of their information from the staff.  If the staff isn't pulling its weight AND  they are overpaid AND they have duplication of responsibilities AND they are providing no answers or outright misinformation - then we have a BIG problem with more waste of our money. 

The closer we get to the July election, the more people need to get ready to pack their things and go.  We need new perspective and people who are not tied to the "friends and family" network.  Start thinking about whom you can encourage to run for the job of school board representative now so that they will have time to step up and toss their hat in the ring whenever that time comes!


Friday, April 6, 2012

Call Upon CEO Burrell Ellis to Deny T-Mobile Cell Phone Towers at Schools

(click headline to read full text of press release) 

...  and GTCO-ATL Issues a Call Upon Gov. Nathan Deal to Veto the Cell Tower Referendum.  We do not need state interference in our local issue. 

The general public is not adequately informed to provide input into
this issue.  Placing this topic on a primary ballot (in July) or a Presidential ballot (in Nov.) will not provide any useful data as the question has been poorly worded and actually attempts to ask multiple questions at one time.  It also does not allow for a
"unknown" or "not aware" response which is likely the best way to describee most of the residents countywide.

Click for press release and more details.
Ceo.and.Gov.deal.Plea.gtco Atl.pr.04.06

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Stealth Means Sneaky: That Defines the Telecoms


Reprint from the Tucker Patch
Stealth Means Sneaky: That Defines the Telecoms
Posted on April 5, 2012 at 5:25 am
School Board (former) Chairman Tom Bowen's statement
made to the media for the 11 p.m. news on the
night before the cell tower vote in DeKalb.  Bowen
didn't show up for the meeting the next
evening and did not vote.  Yet, he is now back in
the media giving out misinformation and downplaying
the 10 months of public protest.  And this guy
wants to be elected as a county commissioner?

Great information has been brought to our attention from Briarcliff Heights Community Action Group (the blindsided neighborhood in Atlanta that only learned in November that a cell tower is planned for the middle of their quiet community, destroying their dog park and backyard views).

Here's a list they provided of the canidates this year who are coming into the race using telecom dollars to back them.

Hidden agendas are likely when you know that telecoms invented things like the public notification scam that actually intends to attract no one to their meetings and the "stealth" cell towers, which, by definition, means "sneaky" (as opposed to disguised which would imply "hidden.").

Back in 1996, when no one in the general public was even thinking about whether or not a cell phone might someday be able to transfer digial video images or that it might cause cancer, the telecoms had a hand in writing a little thing called the Telecommunications Act, which was intended to help wireless companies start-up new businesses and increase competition to keep prices affordable for all Americans.

Instead, it has been used to buy-up any start-ups or smaller competitors and run over local governments and intimidate them into backing down from enforcing their own laws and ordinances. And, they convinced Congress to put a little line into that Act that states a local government cannot deny a wireless transmission tower permit solely on the grounds of environmental factors as long as it complys with FCC standards.

Through the court system, they have since convinced us that "envirnomental" also means "health" even though no other Act or Bill has ever been interpreted that way. And, they've convinced some local governments that they are not even allowed to discuss the possible health effects.  That's censorship and you would think government officials would know that's not allowed, but somehow we still run into this problem.  They've even convinced some school boards that they, too, must follow the rules intended for zoning boards and they can use the Telecom Act as a means to convince parents that there is no other choice than to let the cell tower companies put whatever they want wherever they want and we should all be greatful.

So, doesn't it make you wonder... if no one was talking about the health or environmental effects of cell phones in 1996 or even considering using that as a reason to deny a tower...  and no one had been faced with the issue of whether or not a cell tower would be safe to put in someone's backyard or at a child's playground ...  then how did that language about the envirnomental effects make its way into the Telecommunications Act of 1996?  Who would have thought to put something ridiculous like that in there?

Obviously, the answer is that someone did know about the environmental effects, or at least . And, they expected us to be upset about it. And they knew they would have a fight on their hands that they would likely lose, if we were allowed to talk about the environmental and health effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation, also known as microwave radiation.

If they told us they wanted us to put a small microwave oven up to our ear and hold it against our heads for hours at a time, we would likely tell them to get lost. If they told us that we would have to pay them hundreds of dollars a month for the privedledge of doing this, we would use stronger language. If they said they were going to do this to our children against their will, we would have them arrested and thrown in jail.

But, all these things are true. And look where we are today. We hold miniture, low frequency devices that emit microwave radiation up to our ears or in our hands or place them in our pockets. We are forced to send children to schools that have this form of radiation being emitted from a tower over their heads all day every day.

We want our government to deny permits based on concerns about the health effects, but we are told not to talk about it. We look at the FCC guidelines and they contain nothing about the cumulative effects of multiple towers and multiple devices all working together to increase the background levels of radiation we are exposed to every day without our consent.

We want to protest, but a new state law tell us we cannot do that either.

We want a bill to ban these towers from our schools. Instead we are left with a non-binding question that is poorly worded that will go on a ballot in the middle of the Summer, the same time that they snuck their deal through last year with our school board. We appreciate Rep. Karla Drenner's efforts to pass legislation to ban cell towers from school grounds, but how did we get left with a referendum to put a question to voters that doesn't even need to be asked?

We have heard from every corner of this county. Isn't it obvious that everyone who has learned what the school board is trying to do is against it? There was no one who came to any of the cell tower hearings at the state capitol to complain that they needed a cell tower and it had to be allowed at our schools. There was a room full of people who were against it. We filled every second of public comment time we were permitted at every hearing they held and all the voices were saying, ultimately, the same thing: NO! We do not approve! We do not want this! Cell towers do not have anything to do with education and should not be allowed to use our public land to further their profit objectives.

Politicians are handed money from lobbyists with corporate goals in mind.
We are being taxed until we can no longer afford to live in our own homes. We can't afford the gas to put in our cars to get to work. And they even want to tax us to use the very roadways we need to take us to our jobs. Or, to get our kids to the "better" schools that we know are not in our neighborhood, but we think might be out there somewhere. We just have to drive far enough to find them, right?
There is nothing wrong with a debate over the issues and politicians who are willing to take a side and defend their reasons for it.  And, we are happy to head that the DeKalb County Commissioners have written to CEO Burrell Ellis to say that they would like to enforce the county's zoning laws when T-mobile applies for cell tower permits, but why did it take them so long to speak up about doing their jobs?

When a debate becomes a one-sided campaign to drown out the citizens who are seen as nothing more than a mere obstacle in the way of corporate profit margins, then it's time to do something more than what we are doing now.

I, for one, have written to the Governor Nathan Deal and asked that he consider no signing off on the referendum that will place a question on July's ballot that is poorly constructed, misleading and can do nothing to help those of us involved in the effort to keep cell towers off school grounds. It's non-binding. It doesn't even use the words "cell" or "wireless." It combines multiple questions into one and it doesn't allow you to say, "I don't know" or "I need more information" or "unaware."
But other than beg for help, which we have been doing for nearly a year through our unofficial group, Get the Cell Out - Atlanta, what can we do? Relocate? Hide?  Live in fear? Let them win? Give up? Or VOTE!

I will opt to VOTE this election and I will encourage everyone I know to do the same. VOTE! Do the homework and learn the issues. If you are taking a vacation in July, make sure you get an absentee ballot. If you are not registered, please REGISTER TO VOTE NOW!

And if you vote in the school board election, with or without children of your own, just remember: ALL INCUMBENTS MUST GO! It's as easy as that. Yet, it's so difficult if we do not join forces and do the right thing. The citizens of DeKalb County have the power, the money and the numbers to set our county straight.  Let's do something about the problems this year. Let's remind every elected official who they work for and what we demand they do for us in exchange for the comfortable office and the cushy jobs they enjoy.

VOTE! And if you value your life, make a resolution to reduce your use of wireless services and don't hold your phone to your head, ever!

Visit the Get The Cell Out site for more information and sign the countywide petition which will soon be delivered to CEO Burrell Ellis in expectation that his office will have the final say regarding permits for towers at our schools. Your name can remain annoymous online and information will not be used for any other purpose than delivery to elected officials who can help us stop the towers.

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Election Year: Who Is Taking Telecom $?

Great information has been brought to our attention from Briarcliff Heights Community Action Group (the blindsided neighborhood in Atlanta that only learned in November that a cell tower is planned for the middle of their quiet community, destroying their dog park and backyard views). 

Here's a list they provided of the canidates this year who are coming into the race using telcom dollars to back them:  http://www.briarcliffheights.org/2012/04/02/election-year-whos-taking-telecom/

Hidden agendas are likely when you know that telecoms invented things like the public notification scam that actually intends to attract no one to their meetings and the "stealth" cell towers, which, by definition, means "sneaky" (as opposed to disguised which would imply "hidden."). 

And, back in 1996, when no one in the general public was even thinking about whether or not a cell phone might someday be able to transfer digial video images, the telecoms had a hand in writing a little thing called the Telecommunications Act, which was intended to help wireless companies start-up new businesses and increase competition to keep prices affordable for all Americans.  Instead, it has been used to buy-up any start-ups or smaller competitors and run over local governments and intimidate them into backing down from enforcing their own laws and ordinances.  And, they convinced Congress to put a little line into that Act that states a local government cannot deny a wireless transmission tower permit solely on the grounds of environmental factors as long as it complys with FCC standards. 

Through the court system, they have since convinced us that "envirnomental" also means "health" even though no other Act or Bill has even been interpreted that way.  And, they've convinced some local governments that they are not even allowed to discuss the possible health effects.  And they've convinced some school boards that they can use that same language to convince parents that there is nothing they are also barred from discussing this topic. 

So, doesn't it make you wonder... if no one was talking about the health or environmental effects of cell phones in 1996 or even considering using that as a reason to deny a tower...  and no one had even been faced with the issue of whether or not a cell tower would be safe to put in someone's backyard or at a child's playground ...  then how did that language make its way into the Telecommunications Act of 1996? 

Obviously, the answer is that someone did know.  And, they expected us to be upset about it.  And they knew they would have a fight on their hands that they would likely lose, if we were allowed to talk about the environmental and health effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation, also known as microwave radiation.  If they told us they wanted us to put a small microwave up to our ear and hold it against our heads for hours at a time, we would likely tell them to get lost.  If they told us that we would have to pay them hundreds of dollars a month for the privedledge of doing this, we would use stronger language.  If they said they were going to do this to our children against their will, we would have them arrested and thrown in jail. 

But, all these things are true.  And look where we are today.  We hold miniture, low frequency devices that emit microwave radiation up to our ears or in our hands or place them in our pockets.  We are forced to send children to schools that have this form of radiation being emitted from a tower over their heads all day every day.  We want our government to deny permits based on concerns about the health effects, but we are told not to talk about it.  We look at the FCC guidelines and they contain nothing about the cumulative effects of multiple towers and multiple devices all working together to increase the background levels of radiation we are exposed to every day without our consent.

We want to protest, but a new state law tell us we cannot do that either. 

We want a bill to ban these towers from our schools.  Instead we are left with a non-binding question that is poorly worded that will go on a ballot in the middle of the Summer, the same time that they snuck their deal through last year with our school board.

And politicians are handed money from lobbyists with corporate goals in mind.

And we are being taxed until we can no longer afford to live in our own homes.  We can't afford the gas to put in our cars to get to work.  And they even want to tax us to use the very roadways we need to take us to our jobs.  Or, to get our kids to the "better" schools that we know are not in our neighborhood, but we think might be out there somewhere.  We just have to drive far enough to find them, right? 

There is nothing wrong with a debate over the issues and politicians who are willing to take a side and defend their reasons for it.  But when a debate becomes a one-sided campaign to drown out the citizens who are seen as nothing more than a mere obstacle in the way of corporate profit margins, then it's time to do something more than what we are doing now.

But, what?  Relocate?  Hide?  Live in fear?  Or VOTE!  I will opt to VOTE this election.  And I will encourage everyone I know to do the same.  VOTE!  Do the homework and learn the issues.  If you are taking a vacation in July, make sure you get an absentee ballot.  If you are not registered, please REGISTER TO VOTE NOW! 

And if you vote in the school board election, with or without children of your own, just remember:  ALL INCUMBANTS MUST GO!  It's as easy as that.  And, yet, it's so difficult if we do not join forces and do the right thing.  The citizens of DeKalb County have the power, the money and the numbers to set our county straight.  Let's do something about the problems this year.  Let's remind every elected official who they work for and what we demand they do for us in exchange for the comfortable office and the cushy jobs they enjoy. 

VOTE!  And, if you value your life, make a resolution to reduce your use of wireless services and don't hold  your phone to your head, ever!

Tuesday, April 3, 2012

Dear Ms. Teal and the Officers of the Georgia Council of Administrators of Special Education

I am writing to you today to ask for your help with a very serious matter taking place in DeKalb County that may have a significant and possibly harmful impact upon one of our county's most vulnerable populations, the most severely mentally and physically disabled children.

These children attend school from K - 12, practically their entire childhood, at a special school that our school board has designated solely for the purpose of their education and fulfilling their special needs.  This school is called the Margaret Harris Comprehensive School and it is located at 1634 Knob Hill Dr. Atlanta, GA 30329.   For more information about them, you can view their website here:  http://www.dekalb.k12.ga.us/margaretharris/.

In May 2011, just prior to the Summer break and during a very busy time for students and parents, a notice was reportedly send home with children at 12 schools thoughout the county.  My child's school was one of them and I kept a copy of the flyer.  You can view it here:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/86772448/58801355-Official-Notice-by-T-Mobile-and-DeKalb-County-School-Board.

The school board posted a similar notice on its website, but obviously from the vauge wording, no one would have thought at the time that the meetings were about putting cell towers on school grounds.  It sounded like the school was simply being used as a community meeting space.  As you might expect, turnout at most meetings was low or non-existant.  Those who did show up in most cases were the principal, a few people from the school board and their staff, the T-mobile presenters and possibly one or two PTA officers who were encouraged to attend.

The Margaret Harris School is located in a residential neighborhood and they do not want the intrusion of a dangerous and ugly cell phone tower next to their homes and schools.  They have posted signs in many of their yards in protest and have started a website:  www.briarcliffheightscommunityactiongroup.org.  They are fighting on behalf of the community rights, but I'm concerned that they have not been able to reach any of the parents at the Margaret Harris School to warn them of the dangers.  Someone needs to let these people know in case the radiofrequency from a 150' cell tower with a 60' x 60' base with room for up to 3 additional carriers might be something their child cannot tolerate.

These children may be electro-sensitive, a recognized medical condition, or they may have lower immune systems, making them particularly suspectible to the dangers some say cell towers might pose to cellular DNA and biological material with continuos long-term exposure.  I urge you to refer to the website for The Center for Safer Wireless for more facts about this issue.

Of particular concern is any children who may have coclear implants.  My husband is a physical therapist and he has heard that some levels of RF can actually damage or permanently ruin these expensive devices, which are actual surgical implants to help the child hear.  It would be a great expense and trauma to have a child undergo surgery to corrrect something if the damage can be avoided.

We have tried out best to warn the school board, the county commissioners, the CEO of DeKalb County and even our state Representatives and Senators.  We are not getting anywhere.

From the date of application to the county, there is a federally guaranteed right to file an appeal that can result in full refund of attorneys fees.  In addition, we think these children can be represented by someone with a license to practice law pertaining to the Americans with Disabilities Act.  We are just not sure whom we should contact since we do not actually have a child or any contacts at the school.  We do not believe the principal or the PTA will be helpful as they may possibly be a part of the agreement that will result in some money coming to the school if the towers go up.  This is unconfirmed because as the contract is written, all money really goes right to the county school board.

We hope by passing this information to you, perhaps someone can look into the situation and make sure there are no violation of rights taking place here.  I became even more concerned recently when Crossroads newspaper reported that absolutely zero people were in attendance for the public meeting from Margaret Harris School.   I believe that is because they simply did not know anything about it, not because they were okay with it.

Thanks for your time. 

Friday, February 10, 2012

DeKalb, Delegation and Disaster

(click headline for the full story)

Watch your legislative officials at work and count how many times ANYONE mentions the words children or education. 

Read articles on this topic, like this one, on the DeKalb School Watch Blog:

or on the AJC "Get Schooled" Blog:

Check out the Proposed School Zoning Map in question.   The X's represent where the board members live who will continue their terms, clockwise from the top:  Jester, Edler, Walker, Cunningham, Copelin-Wood.  We've updated this version of the map to indicate where the cell towers (as proposed) will be located as well as the location of the schools where the towers were orignally planned, but were removed from the list.

Click picture to enlarge.


Here is the map that was proposed during the substitute motion.  It has seven districts, but does not indicate how the members would be split up among those districts.
It was not clear which of the board members would continue or whether a new election would be held for all districts.

The final map will be determined sometime before Wednesday, Feb. 17 without any further public input. 
This is a very good showdown worth watching... it's up there with your favorite episode of Housewives of Atlanta...  check it out...

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

GTCO-ATL Members Named TIME's "Person of the Year"

THAT'S RIGHT --- YOU ARE TIME MAGAZINE'S 2011 PERSON OF THE YEAR!

(click headline for the full story)
Every year, Time Magaizine looks at the political, social and economic landscape of our planet.  They review all the people who have made headlines and those who have made an impact to positively influence or change the world.

And, this year, the "Person of the Year" is ...


        "The Protester"

Congratulate yourself right now . . .  because if you have followed Get the Cell Out - Atlanta, contributed to the opposition of cell towers in DeKalb County, voted "No" on SPLOST IV, signed a petition, spoke out at a school board meeting, called your county commissioners, contacted the DeKalb County Office of Planning & Sustainability or the county CEO, written a letter or sent an email to our state legislators or Georgia Board of Education, contacted the media, written a blog, attended a public meeting, put a sign in your yard or even just discussed the cell tower factor with others in an effort to share what you know or learn more for yourself, we think you can consider yourself to be an active member of the Get the Cell Out - Atlanta Chapter protest.  And, as an active protester who is concerned about our schools, our communities and our future - you can also start telling people that YOU are the TIME Magazine "Person of the Year."

YOU are the TIME Magazine "Person of the Month."  You are part of something BIG, somethiing that is GROWING and something that we hope will be a contributing factor to positive change for all of the residents and visitors of DeKalb County.

Our mission:  Demand Ethics, Transparency and Accountability from our leaders.

Our goal:  To unite the county in the opposition of cell towers and other radiation hazards that are dangerous, may pose an increased health risk and decrease the value of our homes. 

Here is a brief excerpt from this issue of TIME:

Is there a global tipping point for frustration? Everywhere, it seems, people said they'd had enough. They dissented; they demanded; they did not despair, even when the answers came back in a cloud of tear gas or a hail of bullets. They literally embodied the idea that individual action can bring collective, colossal change.

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2101745_2102139_2102380,00.html #ixzz1gWiweK5y

"The 2011 Person of the Year issue is the product of a year's worth of reporting and thinking," said TIME editor Richard Stengel.  "From the beginning of the Arab Spring, we dedicated an abundance of resources to this world-historical story. We also watched as the germ of protest spread to Europe and then America and now Russia." 

Stenegel and vetern essayist and novelist Kurt Andersen visited Egypt and Tunisia to trace this revolution to its roots.  Anderson then wrote the impactful commemorative piece that explains the connections and the larger meaning of a world experiencing simultaneous protests in dozens of countries.

Chelsea Elliot, 25, from New York was profiled in the article for her role as an early protester in the Occupy Wallstreet movement.  When asked what she wanted people to know about the movement, she said, "I feel this is an amazing time to be alive in America — at this point we actually have the opportunity for change, in this moment of destruction. So I feel like there's a great chance to rebuild and I hope people get involved and realize that our economy is not the way that it is because of a change in wind, it's because of wrongdoing on our government and very powerful businessmen's part."

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2101745_2102138_2102242,00.html #ixzz1gXnyfKYD

On the homefront, Get the Cell Out - Atlanta Chapter, is a classic example of the unrest that is being felt throughout our country.  Our message started out small and has just continued to grow.  We had no idea what other peoople thought about this topic when we started or whether they would even open the door when we knocked on it with our petition in hand.  But, as time goes by, we have been encouraged and energized by the growing realization that the message is getting through, people are really paying attention and, as we had suspected, they are mad!  Regardless if they have children who attend one of the proposed cell tower schools, or if they live nearby, there are now more than 1,000 people who have listened or read about this issue online and they have been able to weed through the industry garbage to get toi the truth.  Some have felt moved enough to take action themselves. 

To bring about real change, it will take the ongoing effort of every peson who has educated themselves about this issue to make a committment to introduce others to the subject matter so that they can also become educated about it, too. 

It's a lot more difficult to change public policy if you have not been able to change public opinion.  Just like it is a lot more difficult to have a cell tower taken down than it is to stop one from going up!  We are not saying hat it can't be done, but the more we speak out now, and the more dedicated we can become to seeking the truth rather than accepting the lies, the more hardship we may be saving ourselvs or our children in the future.

Congratulations to protesters everywhere! 
YOU are changing the world!

Keep up the great work and remember that T-mobile doesn't look to put towers in communities that will stand together, speak out and then work to warn others --  they put towers in places where they think no one cares!  If you care, do something about it!